Comparative energy use in cassava production under different farming technologies in Kwara State of Nigeria

被引:3
作者
Adekanye, Timothy [1 ]
Oni, Kayode C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Landmark Univ, Dept Agr & Biosyst Engn, PMB 1001, Omu Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria
[2] Univ Ilorin, Dept Agr & Biosyst Engn, PMB 1515, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria
关键词
Agriculture; Cassava; Yield; Energy use pattern; Model; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; PROVINCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.indic.2022.100173
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
One of the main components of production expenses in agricultural operations is energy. The effectiveness of its application is frequently impacted in favor of other equally important aspects. The energy utilization in cassava production in three distinct farm sizes and technologies in Kwara State, Nigeria, was investigated using parametric equations. Questionnaires were used to obtain data on output from 175 cassava farmers. Farms were separated into three groups: group 1 (no mechanization), group 2 (partial mechanization), and group 3 (complete mechanization) (full mechanization). There were 92 farms in Group 1 (1-5 ha), 54 farms in Group 2 (6-15 ha), and 29 farms in Group 3 (16-50 ha). Human labor, machinery, diesel fuel, chemicals, seed, and fertilizers as inputs influenced cassava yield. Cassava production used 4904.87 MJ/ha/tonne in small-scale farms, 36352.04 MJ/ha/tonne in medium-scale farms, and 96257.93 MJ/ha/tonne in large-scale farms, according to the study's findings. In the study region, the average energy output of cassava production was 107,632 MJ/ha, 604,800 MJ/ ha, and 2,016,000 MJ/ha in the various farms. The energy input-output ratios for the three types of farms were calculated to be 16.13, 16.69, and 20.94 respectively. The Cobb-Douglas function was used to calculate the impacts of inputs on cassava outputs. In medium and large-scale farms, indirect and non-renewable energy contributed significantly more to yield than direct and renewable energy. Human labor, fertilizers, chemicals, and seed were statistically significant contributors to cassava productivity, according to empirical findings.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Adekanye T., IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V445, DOI [10.1088/1755-1315/445/1/012062,012062, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/445/1/012062,012062]
[2]  
Adekanye T.A., AGR ENG INT CIGR J, V22, P98
[3]  
Adekanye TA., 2013, World Journal of Agricultural Research, V1, P14, DOI [10.12691/wjar-1-1-4, DOI 10.12691/WJAR-1-1-4]
[4]  
Akinpelu A. O., 2011, Journal of Agriculture and Social Research (JASR), V11, P118
[5]  
Ansari R., 2018, Proceedings, V2, P184, DOI 10.3390/ecws-2-04953
[6]  
Bamgboye A.I., 2015, Energy and Env. Res, V5, P42
[7]   The effect of EurepGAP standards on energy input use: A comparative analysis between certified and uncertified greenhouse tomato producers in Turkey [J].
Bayramoglu, Zeki ;
Gundogmus, Erdemir .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 50 (01) :52-56
[8]   Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: Case study for Antalya Region, Turkey [J].
Canakci, M ;
Topakci, M ;
Akinci, I ;
Ozmerzi, A .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 46 (04) :655-666
[9]  
Cobb C. W., 1928, The American Economic Review, V18, P139, DOI DOI 10.2307/1811556
[10]   Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: A case study from Isparta province [J].
Demircan, V ;
Ekinci, K ;
Keener, HM ;
Akbolat, D ;
Ekinci, C .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 47 (13-14) :1761-1769