Basal cell carcinomata: Risk factors for incomplete excision and results of re-excision

Introduction: Re-excision of incompletely excised basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) can be unsatisfactory in the absence of residual tumours. Recommended guidelines do suggest re-excision as a treatment modality; however, its value has been questioned due to low or variable residual tumour presence. We analysed the incomplete excision and re-excision rates and the presence of residual tumours over an 18-month period in a single unit. Method: Using pathology results and case notes, 2586 primary excisions of BCCs in 1717 patients were reviewed. Results: The incomplete excision rate was reported to be 7.1% (184/2586). Excision of a lesion by multiple excision lesion procedure was associated with a higher rate of incomplete excision when compared to single lesion excision procedure (61.5% vs. 38.5%). Of the incompletely excised BCCs, 33.6% (62/184) were re-excised, of which 62.9% (39/62) had residual tumours. Although the figures are small, most anatomical sites examined had a residual tumour presence >50%. Conclusion: After evaluating each patient individually, considering the high residual tumour rate, re-excision of an incompletely excised BCC would be a worthwhile procedure. (C) 2016 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.