Comparative Evaluation of Fitness of Interpolation Techniques of ArcGIS Using Leave-One-Out Scheme for Air Quality Mapping

被引:31
作者
Kumar, Awkash [1 ,2 ]
Dhakhwa, Shraddha [1 ]
Dikshit, Anil K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sustainable Approach Green Environm, SAGE, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Environm Sci & Engn Dept, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Air quality monitoring; Interpolation technique; SO2; NO2; SPM; SPATIAL INTERPOLATION; WEATHER RESEARCH; HEALTH-RISKS; POLLUTION; IMPACT; METEOROLOGY; DISPERSION; PARTICLES; AERMOD; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s41651-022-00102-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Air pollution is one of the most critical concerns encountered in urban areas, especially in developing nations. Four out of five cities in the world with the worst air quality are located in India. The concentration levels of air pollutants, including sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and suspended particulate matter (SPM), are monitored by instituted air monitoring stations. The present study assesses the spatial air quality and the fitness of spatial mapping using data collected by monitoring stations in Mumbai, India. As part of this, air quality was monitored at twelve selected locations in Mumbai city. The collected data were spatially interpolated using the available interpolation tools of ArcGIS, including inverse distance weight (IDW), kriging (spherical and Gaussian), and spline techniques by the leave-one-out scheme. In each case, the interpolated concentrations of SO2, NO2, and SPM at the eleven locations were compared to the observed values of the unmonitored locations in the corresponding region. Percentage error, normal mean bias (NMB), normal root mean square error (NRMSE), and degree of agreement ("d") were carried out to evaluate the spatial interpolation methods adopted for air quality mapping. The spline method is not preferred for spatial mapping due to negative concentrations in many locations due to either overestimation or underestimation. The minimum average percentage error for SO2 and NO2 mapping is achieved using IDW interpolation, while SPM mapping is achieved by the kriging method. The NMB and "d" were minimum for IDW, while NRMSE was minimum for the kriging Gaussian method in all the cases. The results of this study can be used in low-middle-income countries (LMIC) to obtain an aerial view of air quality to help the regulatory bodies in policy formulation and decision-making. This method needs fewer resources and time when compared to setting up new monitoring stations or using dispersion modeling to obtain an aerial perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, Air quality guidelines. global update 2005, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02986808
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollutionREVIHAAP project
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, GUID CONT EM MON SYS
  • [4] Bailey T. C., 1995, INTERACTIVE SPATIAL, V413
  • [5] MULTIVARIATE SPATIAL INTERPOLATION AND EXPOSURE TO AIR-POLLUTANTS
    BROWN, PJ
    LE, ND
    ZIDEK, JV
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 1994, 22 (04): : 489 - 509
  • [6] Intercomparison of atmospheric dispersion models
    Caputo, M
    Giménez, M
    Schlamp, M
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (18) : 2435 - 2449
  • [7] Central Pollution Control Board Government of India, 2009, National Ambient Air Quality Standards
  • [8] GAHP, 2019, POLL HLTH METR GLOB
  • [9] SPATIAL ECONOMETRICS - METHODS AND MODELS - ANSELIN,L
    GRIFFITH, DA
    [J]. ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 1989, 65 (02) : 160 - 162
  • [10] Ambient air pollutant monitoring and analysis protocol for low and middle income countries: An element of comprehensive urban air quality management framework
    Gulia, Sunil
    Khanna, Isha
    Shukla, Komal
    Khare, Mukesh
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 222