Alliance in Group Therapy: A Meta-Analysis

被引:49
作者
Alldredge, Cameron T. [1 ]
Burlingame, Gary M. [1 ]
Yang, Chongming [2 ]
Rosendahl, Jenny [3 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Clin Psychol, 238 Taylor Bldg,1190 North 900 East, Provo, UT 84604 USA
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Coll Family Home & Social Sci, Provo, UT 84604 USA
[3] Jena Univ Hosp, Inst Psychosocial Med & Psychotherapy, Jena, Germany
关键词
alliance; member-leader alliance; rupture and repair; group therapy; group treatment; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; FILE-DRAWER PROBLEM; GROUP COHESION; WORKING ALLIANCE; GROUP-PSYCHOTHERAPY; DRUG; PREDICTORS; RETENTION; QUESTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1037/gdn0000135
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: Alliance is considered to be one of the oldest, most well-researched themes in psychotherapy. This article presents a brief history of alliance, its most common definitions and measures used in group treatment, and a meta-analytic review of the alliance-outcome relationship in group therapy. Method: Major databases were searched for articles published between 1969 and 2019. We conducted a random effects meta-analysis of published articles that reported the relation between alliance and treatment outcome within the group format. Results: Results from 29 studies including 3,628 patients indicate that the weighted average correlation between alliance and treatment outcome is significant r =.17 (p < .001), with a small effect size (corresponding to d = 0.34). Heterogeneity of effect sizes was low (Q = 36.47, df = 28, p =.131, I-2 = 23.2). Two variables were found to moderate the alliance-outcome association (treatment orientation and reporting perspective of alliance). Conclusion: With a substantial link between alliance and outcome established, the importance of therapeutic alliance rupture and repair in group therapy is discussed and treatment guidelines are outlined.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 28
页数:16
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Alliance as a mediator of expectancy effects in short-term group psychotherapy [J].
Abouguendia, M ;
Joyce, AS ;
Piper, WE ;
Ogrodniczuk, JS .
GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2004, 8 (01) :3-12
[2]  
Alexander L.B., 1987, The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook, P325
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, ANN M SOC EXPL PSYCH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EUR SOC PSYCH RES C
[5]   Modeling group process constructs at three stages in group psychotherapy [J].
Bakali, Jan V. ;
Baldwin, Scott A. ;
Lorentzen, Steinar .
PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2009, 19 (03) :332-343
[6]   Therapeutic alliance as a predictor of outcome and retention in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study [J].
Barber, JP ;
Luborsky, L ;
Gallop, R ;
Crits-Christoph, P ;
Frank, A ;
Weiss, RD ;
Thase, ME ;
Connolly, MB ;
Gladis, M ;
Foltz, C ;
Siqueland, L .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 69 (01) :119-124
[7]  
Bordin ES, 1979, Psych Psychother Theory Res Pract, V16, P252, DOI [DOI 10.1037/H0085885, 10.1037/h0085885]
[8]   Therapeutic alliance: Predicting continuance and success in group treatment for spouse abuse [J].
Brown, PD ;
O'Leary, KD .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 68 (02) :340-345
[9]   COHESION, ALLIANCE AND OUTCOME IN GROUP-PSYCHOTHERAPY [J].
BUDMAN, SH ;
SOLDZ, S ;
DEMBY, A ;
FELDSTEIN, M ;
SPRINGER, T ;
DAVIS, MS .
PSYCHIATRY-INTERPERSONAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1989, 52 (03) :339-350
[10]  
Burlingame G. M., 2004, Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, V5, P647