Strategic intent as a contingency of the relationship between external knowledge and firm innovation

被引:25
作者
Ko, Young Jin [1 ]
O'Neill, Hugh [2 ]
Xie, Xuanli [3 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, 25-2 Seonggyungwan Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ N Carolina, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, McColl 4602, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Peking Univ, 5 Yiheyuan Rd, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
External knowledge search; Strategic intent; Firm innovation; Ambidexterity; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; SEARCH BEHAVIOR; MODERATING ROLE; EXPLORATION; EXPLOITATION; AMBIDEXTERITY; PERFORMANCE; USERS; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102260
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The effects of searching for external knowledge on firm innovation vary, as demonstrated by evidence reporting positive linear, negative linear, or curvilinear relationships. We use ambidexterity theory to explain how the exploratory and exploitative aspects of knowledge search and strategic intent can complement each other. Specifically, we theorize that a firm's dominant logic creates an overall strategic intent-exploration or exploitation-through the firm's structured interpretation and use of information, which creates a differential effect on the relationship between search practices and firm innovation. In particular, exploratory intent accentuates the positive effects of external search by enabling the assimilation of external knowledge, while an exploitative intent attenuates the positive effects of a search by limiting the use of external information to improving current products. Analyzing firm-level survey, financial information, and the number of patents of 380 firms, we provide empirical support for the effects of a dominant strategic intent on external searches and firm innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities [J].
Adner, R ;
Helfat, CE .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (10) :1011-1025
[2]   Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 Statistics Canada Innovation Survey [J].
Amara, N ;
Landry, R .
TECHNOVATION, 2005, 25 (03) :245-259
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, INT STUDIES MANAGEME
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, OSLO MANUAL 2018 GUI, VCuarta, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264304604-EN, 10.1787/a041f4ef-en, DOI 10.1787/A041F4EF-EN]
[5]   The influence of inbound open innovation on ambidexterity performance: Does it pay to source knowledge from supply chain stakeholders? [J].
Ardito, Lorenzo ;
Petruzzelli, Antonio Messeni ;
Dezi, Luca ;
Castellano, Sylvaine .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 119 :321-329
[6]   The impact of globalization on HRM: The case of South Korea [J].
Bae, J ;
Rowley, C .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2001, 36 (04) :402-428
[7]   Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation [J].
Baldwin, Carliss ;
von Hippel, Eric .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (06) :1399-1417
[8]   Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited [J].
Benner, MJ ;
Tushman, ML .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (02) :238-256
[9]   Open Innovation: RESEARCH, PRACTICES, AND POLICIES [J].
Bogers, Marcel ;
Chesbrough, Henry ;
Moedas, Carlos .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2018, 60 (02) :5-16
[10]   Users as Innovators: A Review, Critique, and Future Research Directions [J].
Bogers, Marcel ;
Afuah, Allan ;
Bastian, Bettina .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 36 (04) :857-875