Influence of Weights in TOPSIS And TMAL Methods on Time of Order-Picking - Simulation Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Dmytrow, Krzysztof [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Szczecin, Inst Econ & Finance, Szczecin, Poland
来源
EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A 2025 VISION TO SUSTAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DURING GLOBAL CHALLENGES | 2020年
关键词
Taxonomic Measure of Location's Attractiveness; TOPSIS method; warehouse management; simulation analysis; WAREHOUSE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In shared storage, the product is often located in many different (often very distant) locations. When completing an order, one of them (or several if visiting one will not cover the demand for the product) should be selected. Locations can be selected according to different criteria: distance from the I/O point, from other locations to be visited during the picking process, degree of demand satisfaction or according to product storage time. One or all of the criteria listed above may be used. For this purpose, multi-criteria decision-making methods can be used. One of the methods used to select a location is TMAL (Taxonomic Measure of Location's Attractiveness) based on Hellwig's Composite Measure of Development, and the other is the well-known TOPSIS method. The aim of the article is comparison of results obtained by both of these methods. Both methods have been compared in terms of the total distance the picker will have to travel during order-picking and the total picking time. Obtained results showed that the shortest order-picking route and time was obtained when the highest weight was put on the degree of demand satisfaction. Also, generally the TOPSIS method generated better results than the TMAL method although only for the order-picking time results were statistically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:9417 / 9425
页数:9
相关论文
共 8 条