A Synthesis Of Knowledge About Caregiver Decision Making Finds Gaps In Support For Those Who Care For Aging Loved Ones

被引:49
作者
Garvelink, Mirjam M. [1 ]
Ngangue, Patrice A. G. [2 ]
Adekpedjou, Rheda [3 ]
Diouf, Ndeye T. [2 ]
Goh, Larissa [4 ]
Blair, Louisa [5 ]
Legare, France [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, CHU Quebec, Populat Hlth & Practice Changing Res Grp, Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] CHU Quebec, Populat Hlth & Practice Changing Res Grp, Res Ctr, Community Hlth, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] CHU Quebec, Populat Hlth & Practice Changing Res Grp, Res Ctr, Epidemiol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[5] CHU Quebec, Populat Hlth & Practice Changing Res Grp, Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Laval, Dept Family Med & Emergency Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[7] Univ Laval, Implementat Shared Decis Making Primary Care, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
FAMILY INVOLVEMENT; DEMENTIA; PEOPLE; PROFESSIONALS; FRAMEWORK; AIDS;
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1375
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
We conducted a mixed-methods knowledge synthesis to assess the effectiveness of interventions to improve caregivers' involvement in decision making with seniors, and to describe caregivers' experiences of decision making in the absence of interventions. We analyzed forty-nine qualitative, fourteen quantitative, and three mixed-methods studies. The qualitative studies indicated that caregivers had unmet needs for information, discussions of values and needs, and decision support, which led to negative sentiments after decision making. Our results indicate that there have been insufficient quantitative evaluations of interventions to involve caregivers in decision making with seniors and that the evaluations that do exist found few clinically significant effects. Elements of usual care that received positive evaluations were the availability of a decision coach and a supportive decision-making environment. Additional rigorously evaluated interventions are needed to help caregivers be more involved in decision making with seniors.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 626
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SUGG RISK BIAS CRIT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, HLTH AFF MILLWOOD, V32
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.PUB4
[4]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[5]   The Role of Health care Professionals in the Decision-Making Process of Family Caregivers Regarding Placement of a Cognitively Impaired Elderly Relative [J].
Couture, Melanie ;
Ducharme, Francine ;
Lamontagne, Julie .
HOME HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2012, 24 (06) :283-291
[6]   Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
O'Connor, Annette ;
Stacey, Dawn ;
Volk, Robert ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Coulter, Angela ;
Thomson, Richard ;
Barrat, Alexandra ;
Butow, Phyllis ;
Barry, Michael ;
Mulley, Albert G. ;
Sepucha, Karen ;
Bernstein, Steven ;
Clarke, Aileen ;
Entwistle, Vikki ;
Feldman-Stewart, Deb ;
Holmes-Rovner, Margaret ;
Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary ;
Moumjid, Nora ;
Ruland, Cornelia ;
Sykes, Alan ;
Whelan, Tim .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7565) :417-419
[7]  
Eriksson E, 2000, Eur J Oncol Nurs, V4, P99, DOI 10.1054/ejon.2000.0084
[8]   Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer [J].
Hack, TF ;
Degner, LF ;
Watson, P ;
Sinha, L .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2006, 15 (01) :9-19
[9]   Improving Decision-Making for Feeding Options in Advanced Dementia: A Randomized, Controlled Trial [J].
Hanson, Laura C. ;
Carey, Timothy S. ;
Caprio, Anthony J. ;
Lee, Tae Joon ;
Ersek, Mary ;
Garrett, Joanne ;
Jackman, Anne ;
Gilliam, Robin ;
Wessell, Kathryn ;
Mitchell, Susan L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2011, 59 (11) :2009-2016
[10]   What are the roles of carers in decision-making for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis multidisciplinary care? [J].
Hogden, Anne ;
Greenfield, David ;
Nugus, Peter ;
Kiernan, Matthew C. .
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2013, 7 :171-181