Occupied and unoccupied sage grouse habitat in Strawberry Valley, Utah

被引:16
作者
Bunnell, KD
Flinders, JT
Mitchell, DL
Warder, JH
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Integrat Biol, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Range & Wildlife Sci Dept, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[3] Utah Div Wildlife Resources, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Big Horn Natl Forest, Sheridan, WY 82801 USA
[5] Uinta Natl Forest, Heber, UT 84302 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT | 2004年 / 57卷 / 05期
关键词
Centrocercus urophasianus; logistic regression; sage-brush; sage grouse;
D O I
10.2307/4003983
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study evaluated multiple aspects of spring/summer sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) habitat in Strawberry Valley, Utah by measuring vegetation associated with nest, brood and adult use sites. In addition, 3 types of random habitats were measured including available habitat within core use areas, random sagebrush (Artemisia spp.)/grass habitat outside core use are-as, and random sagebrush/grass habitat sites that had been converted to an understory of smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leyss) by past range management practices. Logistic regression was used to identify those habitat variables that discriminated between site types. Variables that discriminated adult habitat from brood rearing habitat included: 1) sagebrush height (P less than or equal to 0.01) and 2) forb diversity (P = 0.12) with sagebrush height being greater at adult sites and forb diversity greater at brood sites Variables that significantly discriminated occupied adult habitat from random habitat outside of core use areas included: 1) percent grass cover (P less than or equal to 0.01) and 2) area of sagebrush canopy (P = 0.03) with both variables having grater values in adult habitat. Variables that significantly discriminated occupied adult habitat from random habitat with a smooth brome understory included: 1) percent forb cover (P less than or equal to 0.01), 2) shrub canopy cover (P = 0.02), and 3) area of sagebrush canopy (P = 0.08) with all variables being greater in adult habitat. In addition, this study identified sagebrush age, sagebrush canopy area, and forb diversity as potentially important aspects of sage grouse habitat that have not been previously reported.
引用
收藏
页码:524 / 531
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
Apa A.D., 1998, THESIS U IDAHO MOSCO
[3]  
AUTENREITH RE, 1981, WILDLIFE B, V9
[4]  
Bonham C.D., 1989, Measurements for terrestrial vegetation
[5]  
BRAUN C E, 1977, Wildlife Society Bulletin, V5, P99
[6]   SAGE GROUSE USE OF NEST SITES IN SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO [J].
CONNELLY, JW ;
WAKKINEN, WL ;
APA, AD ;
REESE, KP .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1991, 55 (03) :521-524
[7]  
Connelly JW, 2000, WILDLIFE SOC B, V28, P967
[8]  
DRUT MS, 1994, GREAT BASIN NAT, V54, P170
[9]   SUMMER HABITAT USE BY ADULT FEMALE AND JUVENILE SAGE GROUSE [J].
DUNN, PO ;
BRAUN, CE .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1986, 50 (02) :228-235
[10]  
FERGUSON CW, 1964, ANN RINGS BIG SAGE B