Evaluating the sustainability of urban passenger transportation by Monte Carlo simulation

被引:27
作者
Guimaraes, Vanessa de Almeida [1 ]
Leal Junior, Ilton Curty [2 ]
Vieira da Silva, Marcelino Aurelio [3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Fed Educ Tecnol Celso Suckow da Fonseca CEFET, Rua Areal 522,Sala 4D,Parque Mambucaba, BR-23953030 Angra Dos Reis, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Fluminense, Programa Posgrad Adm, Rua Desembargador Ellis Hermydio Figueira 783, BR-27213145 Volta Redonda, RJ, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Engn Transportes, COPPE UFRJ, Ctr Tecnol, Bloco H,Sala 111, BR-21949900 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Performance evaluation; Sustainability; Probabilistic behavior; Monte Carlo simulation; RISK-ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; EMISSIONS; RELIABILITY; EFFICIENCY; POLICIES; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Evaluating the performance of transportation usually is based on average indicator values, incurring a risk of failure to diagnose the system's real performance. Besides this, despite the effort to improve sustainability in this sector, the evaluations generally focus on economic and environmental aspects, avoiding the social ones due to the difficult in measuring it. Therefore, the general objective of this article is to assess the performance of passenger transportation alternatives by applying Monte Carlo simulation to economic, social and environmental indicators. For this purpose, we examined the alternatives for the route between the cities of Rio de Janeiro and Niteroi (located on opposite sides of Guanabara Bay), because of its importance to circulation in the Rio de Janeiro metropolitan region. Besides this, we compared the results of the simulation with the performance ranking obtained by applying average values of the selected indicators. We found that the use of mean values can underestimate or overestimate the performance of the alternatives, besides not considering the uncertainty associated with the indicators. The collective transportation alternatives performed best in the assessment with average indicators, with a tendency to show better performance levels in the probabilistic evaluation. Finally, the indicator with the strongest influence on the performance of the individual transportation alternatives was cost, while trip time was most relevant in the collective alternatives.
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 752
页数:21
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Ali M, 2000, P THR 120 ASEE ANN C
[2]   Comparative analysis of passenger transport sustainability in European cities [J].
Alonso, Andrea ;
Monzon, Andres ;
Cascajo, Rocio .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 48 :578-592
[3]  
[Anonymous], PLAN DEC EXP EN 2024
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, GUID SUST TRANSP PER
[5]  
[Anonymous], P 18 INT C GEOINF BE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, APPL STAT PROBABILIT
[7]   Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Chauhan, Satyaveer S. ;
Omrani, Hichem .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (10) :12270-12280
[8]   Energy and environmental impacts of alternative pathways for the Portuguese road transportation sector [J].
Baptista, Patricia C. ;
Silva, Carla M. ;
Farias, Tiago L. ;
Heywood, John B. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 51 :802-815
[9]  
BarandierJr JR, 2014, EUR TRANSP C, P1
[10]   The effect of uncertainty on US transport-related GHG emissions and fuel consumption out to 2050 [J].
Bastani, Parisa ;
Heywood, John B. ;
Hope, Chris .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (03) :517-548