SELF-EVALUATION AND SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT: THE ISSEMOD MODEL TO DEVELOP THE QUALITY OF SCHOOL PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES

被引:0
作者
Capperucci, Davide [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, I-50121 Florence, Italy
来源
SOCIOINT15: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES | 2015年
关键词
self-evaluation; school effectiveness; quality assurance; accountability; learning organizations; ACCOUNTABILITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Recent European and North American government policies, implementing new systems of evaluation and accountability, have highlighted the use of performance data to inform judgments about schools and stimulate school improvement. This has led to the implementation of school self-evaluation considered as an effective means to increase school quality and effectiveness. Decentralization of education systems, which is the official policy in many European countries, has evoked increased interest in accountability, responsiveness and self-improvement of schools. This trend has promoted, on the one hand a broadening of educational evaluation methodologies and, on the other, a conceptualization of theoretical approaches and research in the field of school effectiveness and improvement. A viable working definition, also used in this research, is that school self-evaluation concerns a type of educational evaluation that is initiated at school level and, at least parialtly, controlled by the school itself. This study presents a self-evaluation model, called the ISSEMod, thought to improve school accountability, applicable in different countries, combining central control managed by public authorities (external control) and the autonomy reserved for schools related to pedagogical, instructional and organizational practices (internal control). Using a sample of 58 Tuscan schools, an empirical and evidence-based model of school self-evaluation focused on a flexible system of areas and indicators to investigate and analyze school quality, is proposed here.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 424
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Akpa C.S., 1991, Studies in Educational Evaluation, V17, P117
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, INT HDB SCH EFFECTIV
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, Education at a glance 2014
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1978, Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2008, DYNAMICS ED EFFECTIV
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2015, ASS QUAL ED POL APPR
  • [8] Barzino G., 2002, European Journal of Teacher Education, V25, P83, DOI [10.1080/0261976022000012886, DOI 10.1080/0261976022000012886]
  • [9] Looking for a balance between internal and external evaluation of school quality: evaluation of the SVI model
    Blok, Henk
    Sleegers, Peter
    Karsten, Sjoerd
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY, 2008, 23 (04) : 379 - 395
  • [10] Brookover W.B., 1979, SCH SOCIAL SYSTEMS S