Failure Mode Risk Analyzing Based on Grey Theory for Power Plant Steam Turbine Proper

被引:4
作者
Wang, Y. [1 ]
Yuan, J. [1 ]
Zhang, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Baoding, Peoples R China
[2] Cent Inst Correct Police, Dept Penol, Baoding, Peoples R China
来源
2009 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS | 2009年
关键词
FMEA; Grey theory; risk priority number (RPN); steam turbine proper;
D O I
10.1109/ICIEEM.2009.5344440
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As one of the top three main equipment groups in power plant, steam turbine system has an essential effect on the reliability and economy of energy production. And the steam turbine proper is the priority among priorities. Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is the technique to help effectively perform hazard prevention and power systems maintenance. In traditional analysis methods, includes fuzzy inference [1], the risk priority number (RPN) ranking mechanism was utilized which has several drawbacks. An improved ranking method based on grey theory is put forward with taking steam turbine for example in this paper. Analysis results are compared in the final.
引用
收藏
页码:1234 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
ANAND P, 2003, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V71, P69
[2]  
Cao CZ, 2003, CHINESE J ORG CHEM, V23, P207
[3]  
Cao Xian-chang, 2005, Proceedings of the CSEE, V25, P119
[4]   A simple approach to ranking a group of aggregated fuzzy utilities [J].
Chen, CB ;
Klein, CM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 1997, 27 (01) :26-35
[5]   CONTROL-PROBLEMS OF GREY SYSTEMS [J].
DENG, JL .
SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 1982, 1 (05) :288-294
[6]  
[董玉亮 Dong Yuliang], 2004, [动力工程, Power engineering], V24, P798
[7]  
*FORD MOT CO, 1988, POTENTIAL FAILURE MO
[8]  
HONG G, 1986, FUZZY MATH, V3, P55
[9]  
Moubray J., 1997, Reliability-centered Maintenance II, V2nd