A multilevel multisite outcomes-by-implementation evaluation of an early childhood literacy model

被引:17
作者
Zvoch, Keith [1 ]
Letourneau, Lawrence E. [1 ]
Parker, Robert P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Dept Educ Psychol, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
关键词
multisite evaluation; treatment fidelity; multilevel growth models;
D O I
10.1177/1098214007301138
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The evaluation of an intervention delivered across multiple treatment sites presents a unique opportunity for evaluators to gauge the manner and degree to which the "impact' of treatment varies across implementation conditions and different target populations. However, the availability of implementation data for each treatment site, while presenting the opportunity for more sophisticated impact assessment, also presents an analytic challenge. In the following, multilevel growth models were applied to data describing students and classroom sites to demonstrate how the multilevel modeling framework can be used to analyze data obtained from a multisite program implementation. Results of the investigation indicated that increased adherence to the program model was not associated with more positive recipient outcomes. Further examination of the null finding indicated that the highest and lowest rates of literacy growth observed in the study were concentrated in several low-implementing sites. Implications for multisite evaluation design and practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 150
页数:19
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   STATISTICAL MODELING ISSUES IN SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS STUDIES [J].
AITKIN, M ;
LONGFORD, N ;
PLEWIS, IF ;
WAKEFIELD, WB ;
CHATFIELD, C ;
GOLDSTEIN, H ;
REYNOLDS, D ;
COX, D ;
ECOB, R ;
GRAY, J ;
BELL, JF ;
BURSTEIN, L ;
DAWID, AP ;
HEALY, MJR ;
HUTCHISON, DA ;
KILGORE, S ;
PENDLETON, WW ;
LAIRD, NM ;
LOUIS, TA ;
PRAIS, SJ ;
RUTTER, M ;
MAUGHAN, B ;
OUSTON, J ;
SHARE, DL ;
SMITH, TMF .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1986, 149 :1-43
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Evaluation studies review annual
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, RESTRUCTURING HIGH S
[4]  
[Anonymous], NEW DIRECTIONS PROGR
[5]  
BABOR TF, 2002, NEW DIRECTIONS EVALU, V94, P17
[6]  
Banks S., 2002, New Directions for Evaluation, V2002, P45
[7]   Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH behavior change consortium [J].
Bellg, AJ ;
Borrelli, B ;
Resnick, B ;
Hecht, J ;
Minicucci, DS ;
Ory, M ;
Ogedegbe, G ;
Orwig, D ;
Ernst, D ;
Czajkowski, S .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 23 (05) :443-451
[8]  
Berman P., 1980, WHY POLICIES SUCCEED, P205
[9]  
Berman P, 1981, Improving schools: Using what we know, P253
[10]  
Bickman L., 1987, USING PROGRAM THEORY, DOI DOI 10.1002/EV.1443