Seismic assessment of concentrically braced steel frames with shape memory alloy braces

被引:130
作者
McCormick, Jason [1 ]
DesRoches, Reginald
Fugazza, Davide
Auricchio, Ferdinando
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst, Kyoto 6110011, Japan
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] SAMTECH Italia, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Pavia, European Sch Adv Studies Reduct Seism Risk ROSE S, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE | 2007年 / 133卷 / 06期
关键词
steel structures; nonlinear analysis; seismic analysis; earthquake resistant structures; innovation; bracing;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:6(862)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The use of special concentrically braced frames has increased since the 1994 Northridge and 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquakes. However, past performance suggests limited ductility and energy dissipation in braced frame systems due to buckling of conventional braces. In order to address this limitation, three- and six-story concentrically braced frames with superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) braces are studied to evaluate their seismic performance in comparison to traditional systems. SMAs are unique metallic alloys that have the ability to undergo large deformations while reverting back to their original undeformed shape providing recentering capabilities to the braced frame. Detailed analytical models of the frames with SMA braces are developed and two suites of ground motions are used to evaluate the structures with respect to interstory drift and residual drift. The results suggest that the SMA braces are effective in limiting interstory drifts and residual drifts during an earthquake, in part, due to the recentering nature of superelastic SMAs.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 870
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Unseating prevention for multiple frame bridges using superelastic devices [J].
Andrawes, B ;
DesRoches, R .
SMART MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 2005, 14 (03) :S60-S67
[2]   Effect of cyclic modeling parameters on the behavior of shape memory alloys for seismic applications [J].
Andrawes, B ;
McCormick, J ;
DesRoches, R .
SMART STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS 2004: SMART STRUCTURES AND INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, 2004, 5390 :324-334
[3]  
ANDRAWES B, 2005, THESIS GEORGIA I TEC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, 350 FEMA
[5]   A one-dimensional model for superelastic shape-memory alloys with different elastic properties between austenite and martensite [J].
Auricchio, F ;
Sacco, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NON-LINEAR MECHANICS, 1997, 32 (06) :1101-1114
[6]   On the dynamic behaviour of elastic-plastic structures equipped with pseudoelastic SMA reinforcements [J].
Baratta, A ;
Corbi, O .
COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2002, 25 (1-2) :1-13
[7]   Comparative response analysis of conventional and innovative seismic protection strategies [J].
Bruno, S ;
Valente, C .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2002, 31 (05) :1067-1092
[8]   Cyclic properties of superelastic shape memory alloy wires and bars [J].
DesRoches, R ;
McCormick, J ;
Delemont, M .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2004, 130 (01) :38-46
[9]   Mechanical behaviour of shape memory alloys for seismic applications - 2. Austenite NiTi wires subjected to tension [J].
Dolce, M ;
Cardone, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 43 (11) :2657-2677
[10]  
Dolce M, 2000, EARTHQUAKE ENG STRUC, V29, P945, DOI 10.1002/1096-9845(200007)29:7<945::AID-EQE958>3.0.CO