Potential Surrogate Endpoints for Prostate Cancer Survival: Analysis of a Phase III Randomized Trial

被引:23
作者
Ray, Michael E. [1 ]
Bae, Kyounghwa [2 ]
Hussain, Maha H. A. [3 ]
Hanks, Gerald E. [5 ]
Shipley, William U. [6 ]
Sandler, Howard M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Radiol Associates Appleton, Appleton, WI 54911 USA
[2] Radiat Therapy Oncol Grp, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[6] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP; GROUP PROTOCOL 92-02; RADIATION-THERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION; BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE; ADJUVANT THERAPY; COLON-CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djn489
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The identification of surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific survival may shorten the length of clinical trials for prostate cancer. We evaluated distant metastasis and general clinical treatment failure as potential surrogates for prostate cancer-specific survival by use of data from the Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group 92-02 randomized trial. Methods Patients (n = 1554 randomly assigned and 1521 evaluable for this analysis) with locally advanced prostate cancer had been treated with 4 months of neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen deprivation therapy with external beam radiation therapy and then randomly assigned to no additional therapy (control arm) or 24 additional months of androgen deprivation therapy (experimental arm). Data from landmark analyses at 3 and 5 years for general clinical treatment failure (defined as documented local disease progression, regional or distant metastasis, initiation of androgen deprivation therapy, or a prostate-specific antigen level of 25 ng/mL or higher after radiation therapy) and/or distant metastasis were tested as surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific survival at 10 years by use of Prentice's four criteria. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results At 3 years, 1364 patients were alive and contributed data for analysis. Both distant metastasis and general clinical treatment failure at 3 years were consistent with all four of Prentice's criteria for being surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific survival at 10 years. At 5 years, 1178 patients were alive and contributed data for analysis. Although prostate cancer-specific survival was not statistically significantly different between treatment arms at 5 years (P=.08), both endpoints were consistent with Prentice's remaining criteria. Conclusions Distant metastasis and general clinical treatment failure at 3 years may be candidate surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific survival at 10 years. These endpoints, however, must be validated in other datasets. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009; 101: 228-236
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 236
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neoadjuvant rectal score as individual-level surrogate for disease-free survival in rectal cancer in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomized phase III trial
    Fokas, E.
    Fietkau, R.
    Hartmann, A.
    Hohenberger, W.
    Gruetzmann, R.
    Ghadimi, M.
    Liersch, T.
    Stroebel, P.
    Grabenbauer, G. G.
    Graeven, U.
    Hofheinz, R-D
    Koehne, C-H
    Wittekind, C.
    Sauer, R.
    Kaufmann, M.
    Hothorn, T.
    Roedel, C.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (07) : 1521 - 1527
  • [22] Sequential vs Concurrent Chemoradiation for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Randomized Phase III Trial RTOG 9410
    Curran, Walter J., Jr.
    Paulus, Rebecca
    Langer, Corey J.
    Komaki, Ritsuko
    Lee, Jin S.
    Hauser, Stephen
    Movsas, Benjamin
    Wasserman, Todd
    Rosenthal, Seth A.
    Gore, Elizabeth
    Machtay, Mitchell
    Sause, William
    Cox, James D.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (19) : 1452 - 1460
  • [23] Single blind randomized Phase III trial to investigate the benefit of a focal lesion ablative microboost in prostate cancer (FLAME-trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Lips, Irene M.
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    Haustermans, Karin
    van Lin, Emile N. J. T.
    Pos, Floris
    Franken, Stefan P. G.
    Kotte, Alexis N. T. J.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    van Vulpen, Marco
    TRIALS, 2011, 12
  • [24] Prostate cancer radiation dose response: Results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial
    Pollack, A
    Zagars, GK
    Starkschall, G
    Antolak, JA
    Lee, JJ
    Huang, E
    von Eschenbach, AC
    Kuban, DA
    Rosen, I
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (05): : 1097 - 1105
  • [25] Magnetic resonance imaging-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (mirage): a phase iii randomized trial
    Ma, Ting Martin
    Lamb, James M.
    Casado, Maria
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    Basehart, T. Vincent
    Yang, Yingli
    Low, Daniel
    Sheng, Ke
    Agazaryan, Nzhde
    Nickols, Nicholas G.
    Cao, Minsong
    Steinberg, Michael L.
    Kishan, Amar U.
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [26] A PROSPECTIVE PHASE III RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF HYPOFRACTIONATION VERSUS CONVENTIONAL FRACTIONATION IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Arcangeli, Giorgio
    Saracino, Biancamaria
    Gomellini, Sara
    Petrongari, Maria Grazia
    Arcangeli, Stefano
    Sentinelli, Steno
    Marzi, Simona
    Landoni, Valeria
    Fowler, Jack
    Strigari, Lidia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (01): : 11 - 18
  • [27] Randomized phase III trial to evaluate radiopharmaceuticals and zoledronic acid in the palliation of osteoblastic metastases from lung, breast, and prostate cancer: report of the NRG Oncology RTOG 0517 trial
    Seider, Michael J.
    Pugh, Stephanie L.
    Langer, Corey
    Wyatt, Gwen
    Demas, William
    Rashtian, Afshin
    Clausen, Cathy L.
    Derdel, Jerome David
    Cleary, Sean F.
    Peters, Christopher A.
    Ramalingam, Ashok
    Clarkson, James E.
    Tomblyn, Michael
    Rabinovitch, Rachel A.
    Kachnic, Lisa A.
    Berk, Lawrence B.
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 32 (08) : 553 - 560
  • [28] Meta-analysis for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in cancer clinical trials
    Shi, Qian
    Sargent, Daniel J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 14 (02) : 102 - 111
  • [29] Analysis of the relapse patterns and risk factors of endometrial cancer following postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in a phase III randomized clinical trial
    Nomura, Hiroyuki
    Aoki, Daisuke
    Susumu, Nobuyuki
    Mizuno, Mika
    Nakai, Hidekatsu
    Arai, Masahide
    Nishio, Shin
    Tokunaga, Hideki
    Nakanishi, Toru
    Watanabe, Yoh
    Yaegashi, Nobuo
    Yokoyama, Yoshihito
    Takehara, Kazuhiro
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 155 (03) : 413 - 419
  • [30] Optimizing Treatment in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial
    Nabid, Abdenour
    Carrier, Nathalie
    Vigneault, Eric
    Van Nguyen, Thu
    Vavassis, Peter
    Brassrard, Marc-Andre
    Bahoric, Boris
    Archambault, Robert
    Vincent, Francois
    Bettahar, Redouane
    Wilke, Derek
    Souhami, Luis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : 732 - 740