Improving Health Literacy Responsiveness: A Randomized Study on the Uptake of Brochures on Doctor-Patient Communication in Primary Health Care Waiting Rooms

被引:9
作者
Jansen, Carel J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Koops van't Jagt, Ruth [1 ,3 ]
Reijneveld, Sijmen A. [4 ]
van Leeuwen, Ellen [1 ]
de Winter, Andrea F. [4 ]
Hoeks, John C. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Arts, Dept Commun & Informat Sci, POB 7600, NL-9700 AS Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Stellenbosch Univ, Language Ctr, 44 Banghoek Rd, ZA-7600 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[3] Aletta Jacobs Sch Publ Hlth, POB 7600, NL-9700 AS Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Hlth Sci, POB 30-001, NL-9700 AS Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
health literacy responsiveness; organizational health literacy; health literacy; health information; health communication; waiting room; doctor-patient communication; photo story; fotonovela; narrative health communication; NARRATIVE COMMUNICATION; STATISTICAL EVIDENCE; INTERVENTIONS; INFORMATION; PERSUASION; FRAMEWORK; EDUCATION; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18095025
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Presenting attractive and useful health education materials in waiting rooms can help improve an organization's health literacy responsiveness. However, it is unclear to what extent patients may be interested in health education materials, such as brochures. We conducted a three-week field study in waiting rooms of three primary care centers in Groningen. Three versions of a brochure on doctor-patient communication were randomly distributed, 2250 in total. One version contained six short photo stories, another version was non-narrative but contained comparable photos, and the third version was a traditional brochure. Each day we counted how many brochures were taken. We also asked patients (N = 471) to participate in a brief interview. Patients who consented (N = 390) were asked if they had noticed the brochure. If yes (N = 135), they were asked why they had or had not browsed the brochure, and why they had or had not taken it. Interview responses were categorized by two authors. Only 2.9% of the brochures were taken; no significant association with brochure version was found. Analysis of the interview data showed that the version with the photo narrative was noticed significantly more often than the non-narrative version or the traditional version. These results suggest that designing attractive and comprehensible health materials is not enough. Healthcare organizations should also create effective strategies to reach their target population.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CBS Statline
[2]   Perceived quality of care: The influence of the waiting room environment [J].
Arneill, AB ;
Devlin, AS .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 22 (04) :345-360
[3]  
Batterham R.W., 2017, International Encyclopedia of Public Health, VSecond, P428, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-803678-5.00190-9, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-803678-5.00190-9]
[4]  
Boyte R. M., 2014, Californian Journal of Health Promotion, V12, P1
[5]  
Brach C., 2012, Attributes of a health literate organization
[6]   Passive interventions in primary healthcare waiting rooms are effective in promoting healthy lifestyle behaviours: an integrative review [J].
Cass, Sarah J. ;
Ball, Lauren E. ;
Leveritt, Michael D. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2016, 22 (03) :198-210
[7]   Using a fotonovela to battle crystal meth in South Africa [J].
Davis, Burt ;
Jansen, Carel .
JOURNAL OF ETHNICITY IN SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2020, 19 (01) :151-169
[8]  
Davis H.D., 2017, THESIS STELLENBOSCH
[9]   Characteristics of Narrative Interventions and Health Effects: A Review of the Content, Form, and Context of Narratives in Health-related Narrative Persuasion Research [J].
de Graaf, Anneke ;
Sanders, Jose ;
Hoeken, Hans .
REVIEW OF COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2016, 4 :88-131
[10]   Moving towards a Comprehensive Approach for Health Literacy Interventions: The Development of a Health Literacy Intervention Model [J].
Geboers, Bas ;
Reijneveld, Sijmen A. ;
Koot, Jaap A. R. ;
de Winter, Andrea F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (06)