Identifying hypertension-related comorbidities from administrative data: What's the optimal approach?

被引:139
|
作者
Borzecki, AM
Wong, AT
Hickey, EC
Ash, AS
Berlowitz, DR
机构
[1] VAMC, Ctr Hlth Qual Outcomes & Econ Res, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Med Ctr, Gen Internal Med Sect, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
administrative data; hypertension; sensitivity; specificity;
D O I
10.1177/106286060401900504
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective was to determine the best strategy for identifying outpatients with hypertension-related diagnoses using Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative databases. We reviewed 1176 outpatient charts from 10 VA sites in 1999, taking the presence of 11 diagnoses relevant to hypertension management as the "gold standard" for identifying the comorbidity. We calculated agreement, sensitivity, and specificity for the chart versus several administrative data-based algorithms. Using 1999 data and requiring 1 administrative diagnosis, observed agreement ranged from 0.98 (atrial fibrillation) to 0.85 (hyperlipidemia), and kappas were generally high. Sensitivity varied from 38% (tobacco use) to 97% (diabetes); specificity exceeded 91% for 10 of 11 diagnoses. Requiring 2 years of data and 2 diagnoses improved most measures, with minimal sensitivity decrease. Agreement between the database and charts was good. Administrative data varied in its ability to identify all patients with a given diagnosis but identified accurately those without. The best strategy for case-finding required 2 diagnoses in a 2-year period.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 206
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What explains the gender gap in wealth? Evidence from administrative data
    Merikull, Jaanika
    Kukk, Merike
    Room, Tairi
    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS OF THE HOUSEHOLD, 2021, 19 (02) : 501 - 547
  • [42] Application of multiple testing procedures for identifying relevant comorbidities, from a large set, in traumatic brain injury for research applications utilizing big health-administrative data
    Jana, Sayantee
    Sutton, Mitchell
    Mollayeva, Tatyana
    Chan, Vincy
    Colantonio, Angela
    Escobar, Michael David
    FRONTIERS IN BIG DATA, 2022, 5
  • [43] PREVALENCE, INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY OF HYPERTENSION IN QUEBEC: PERSPECTIVE FROM ADMINISTRATIVE AND SURVEY DATA
    Blais, C.
    Rochette, L.
    Hamel, D.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 28 (05) : S117 - S118
  • [44] A systematic review of validated methods for identifying transfusion-related sepsis using administrative and claims data
    Carnahan, Ryan M.
    Herman, Ronald A.
    Moores, Kevin G.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2012, 21 : 222 - 229
  • [45] Reproducibility, reliability and validity of population-based administrative health data for the assessment of cancer non-related comorbidities
    Maringe, Camille
    Fowler, Helen
    Rachet, Bernard
    Luque-Fernandez, Miguel Angel
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [46] An amoeboid approach for identifying optimal citation flow in big scholarly data network
    Nivash, J. P.
    Babu, Dhinesh L. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 33 (13)
  • [47] Identifying diabetes cases from administrative data: a population-based validation study
    Lipscomb, Lorraine L.
    Hwee, Jeremiah
    Webster, Lauren
    Shah, Baiju R.
    Booth, Gillian L.
    Tu, Karen
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [48] Identifying diabetes cases from administrative data: a population-based validation study
    Lorraine L. Lipscombe
    Jeremiah Hwee
    Lauren Webster
    Baiju R. Shah
    Gillian L. Booth
    Karen Tu
    BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [49] Identifying Quality Indicators for Palliative and End-of-Life Care from Administrative Data
    Gill, Ashlinder
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2015, 31 (03) : 201 - 201
  • [50] Identifying physician-recognized depression from administrative data: Consequences for quality measurement
    Spettell, CM
    Wall, TC
    Allison, J
    Calhoun, J
    Kobylinski, R
    Fargason, R
    Kiefe, CI
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2003, 38 (04) : 1081 - 1102