How Does Firm Life Cycle Affect Board Structure? Evidence from China's Listed Privately Owned Enterprises

被引:17
作者
Li, Yunhe [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaotian Tina [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Sch Econ, Finance, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] St Marys Coll Calif, Finance, Moraga, CA USA
[3] St Marys Coll Calif, Moraga, CA USA
关键词
board chair-CEO duality; board independence; board size; board structure; China; firm life cycle; privately owned enterprises (POEs); INTERNAL GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS; INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY SET; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; AGENCY COSTS; PERFORMANCE; DIRECTORS; SIZE; DETERMINANTS; OWNERSHIP; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1017/mor.2017.55
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Using data from China's listed privately owned enterprises (POEs) during the period from 2002 to 2014, we explore the effects of firm life cycle on board structure. We find that the board size of China's listed POEs declines over firm life cycle, and there is a trend of separation for board chair-CEO duality while board independence remains almost static. We further provide evidence that board size and independence are determined by the benefits of monitoring and advisory roles of the boards through all the stages of firms' life cycle with different drivers. The impact of CEO power on board chair-CEO duality is determined by the benefits and costs of separation of board chair, and CEOs are supported at all stages of firms' life cycle. This article sheds light on the dynamic board structure in an emerging economy where the external corporate governance is weaker than that of developed countries. Our findings suggest that the board structures of China's listed POEs are adjusted at various stages of firms' life cycle, and the adjustments are mostly based on the resources brought by the new board of directors.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 341
页数:37
相关论文
共 68 条
[21]  
Dodge H.R., 1992, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V30, P27
[22]   STAGE OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL LIFE-CYCLE AND COMPETITION AS MEDIATORS OF PROBLEM PERCEPTION FOR SMALL BUSINESSES [J].
DODGE, HR ;
FULLERTON, S ;
ROBBINS, JE .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1994, 15 (02) :121-134
[23]   A REANALYSIS OF MILLER AND FRIESEN LIFE-CYCLE DATA [J].
DRAZIN, R ;
KAZANJIAN, RK .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1990, 11 (04) :319-325
[24]   A Multi-theory Perspective of Board Leadership Structure: What Does the Egyptian Corporate Governance Context Tell Us? [J].
Elsayed, Khaled .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 21 (01) :80-99
[25]   AGENCY PROBLEMS AND RESIDUAL CLAIMS [J].
FAMA, EF ;
JENSEN, MC .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1983, 26 (02) :327-349
[26]   Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms [J].
Fan, Joseph P. H. ;
Wong, T. J. ;
Zhang, Tianyu .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 84 (02) :330-357
[27]   ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE ON THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY SET AND CORPORATE FINANCING, DIVIDEND, AND COMPENSATION POLICIES [J].
GAVER, JJ ;
GAVER, KM .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1993, 16 (1-3) :125-160
[28]  
Gillan S. L., 2006, WORKING PAPER
[29]   When will boards influence strategy? Inclination x power = strategic change [J].
Golden, BR ;
Zajac, EJ .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (12) :1087-1111
[30]   THE EFFECTS OF BOARD SIZE AND DIVERSITY ON STRATEGIC CHANGE [J].
GOODSTEIN, J ;
GAUTAM, K ;
BOEKER, W .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1994, 15 (03) :241-250