Reversible Power-to-Gas systems for energy conversion and storage

被引:62
作者
Glenk, Gunther [1 ]
Reichelstein, Stefan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mannheim, Mannheim Inst Sustainable Energy Studies, MIT, MIT CEEPR, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Univ Mannheim, Stanford Univ, Leibniz Ctr European Econ Res ZEW, Grad Sch Business,Mannheim Inst Sustainable Energ, Mannheim, Germany
关键词
LEVELIZED COST; FUEL-CELLS; ELECTRICITY; HYDROGEN; IMPACT; WIND; TECHNOLOGIES; ELECTROLYSIS; ECONOMICS; CO2;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-022-29520-0
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Reversible Power-to-Gas systems can convert electricity to hydrogen at times of ample and inexpensive power supply and operate in reverse to deliver electricity during times when power is relatively scarce. Here, the authors show that such systems can already be economically viable relative to current hydrogen prices in the context of the German and Texas electricity markets. In the transition to decarbonized energy systems, Power-to-Gas (PtG) processes have the potential to connect the existing markets for electricity and hydrogen. Specifically, reversible PtG systems can convert electricity to hydrogen at times of ample power supply, yet they can also operate in the reverse direction to deliver electricity during times when power is relatively scarce. Here we develop a model for determining when reversible PtG systems are economically viable. We apply the model to the current market environment in both Germany and Texas and find that the reversibility feature of unitized regenerative fuel cells (solid oxide) makes them already cost-competitive at current hydrogen prices, provided the fluctuations in electricity prices are as pronounced as currently observed in Texas. We further project that, due to their inherent flexibility, reversible PtG systems would remain economically viable at substantially lower hydrogen prices in the future, provided recent technological trends continue over the coming decade.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Long-Duration Electricity Storage Applications, Economics, and Technologies [J].
Albertus, Paul ;
Manser, Joseph S. ;
Litzelman, Scott .
JOULE, 2020, 4 (01) :21-32
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CO2 EM FUEL COMB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, The Future of Coal: Options for a Carbon -Constrained World
[4]   The role of energy storage in deep decarbonization of electricity production [J].
Arbabzadeh, Maryam ;
Sioshansi, Ramteen ;
Johnson, Jeremiah X. ;
Keoleian, Gregory A. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
[5]   Business Models and Profitability of Energy Storage [J].
Baumgarte, Felix ;
Glenk, Gunther ;
Rieger, Alexander .
ISCIENCE, 2020, 23 (10)
[6]  
Beney A. M., 2018, INVESTIGATION HEAT T
[7]  
Braff WA, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P964, DOI [10.1038/nclimate3045, 10.1038/NCLIMATE3045]
[8]  
Businesswire, 2020, Study on the Philippines E-Learning market 2013 to 2023-featuring yapster, blackboard & canvas among others-ResearchAndMarkets.com
[9]   Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: A review [J].
Buttler, Alexander ;
Spliethoff, Hartmut .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 :2440-2454
[10]   The emergence of cost effective battery storage [J].
Comello, Stephen ;
Reichelstein, Stefan .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)