Population-based incidence rates and increased risk of EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer in Maori and Pacifica in New Zealand

被引:10
作者
Aye, Phyu Sin [1 ]
McKeage, Mark James [2 ,3 ]
Tin Tin, Sandar [1 ]
Khwaounjoo, Prashannata [2 ]
Elwood, J. Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Epidemiol & Biostat, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Pharmacol & Clin Pharmacol, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Univ Auckland, Auckland Canc Soc Res Ctr, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITORS; ADENOCARCINOMA HISTOLOGY; MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY; MUTATIONS; NEVER; IMPLEMENTATION; GUIDELINES; SMOKING; IMPACT; ALK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0251357
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutation benefit from targeted treatments. Previous studies reported EGFR mutation-positive proportions among tested non-squamous NSCLC patients. However, incidence rates and population risk of EGFR mutation-positive and EGFR mutation-negative non-squamous NSCLC have not been assessed. This study therefore aimed to estimate the population-based incidence rates of EGFR mutation-positive and EGFR mutation-negative non-squamous NSCLC in different population groups defined by sex, ethnic group and smoking status. Methods This study included data from all non-squamous NSCLC patients diagnosed in northern New Zealand between 1/02/2010 and 31/07/2017 (N = 3815), obtained from a population-based cancer registry. Age-specific incidence rates, WHO age-standardised rates (ASRs) and rates adjusted for incomplete testing were calculated for EGFR mutation-positive and EGFR mutation-negative diseases for the study cohort as a whole and subgroups of patients. Results Among 3815 patients, 45% were tested for EGFR mutations; 22.5% of those tested were EGFR mutation-positive. The ASR of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC was 5.05 (95%CI 4.71-5.39) per 100,000 person-years. ASRs for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC were higher for females than males: standardised incidence ratio (SIR) 1.50 (1.31-1.73); higher for Pacifica, Asians and Maori compared with New Zealand Europeans: SIRs 3.47 (2.48-4.85), 3.35 (2.62-4.28), and 2.02 (1.43-2.87), respectively; and, only slightly increased in ever-smokers compared with never-smokers: SIR 1.25 (1.02-1.53). In contrast, the ASR of EGFR mutation-negative NSCLC was 17.39 (16.75-18.02) per 100,000 person-years, showing a strong association with smoking; was higher for men; highest for Maori, followed by Pacifica and then New Zealand Europeans, and lowest for Asians. When corrected for incomplete testing, SIRs by sex, ethnicity and smoking, for both diseases, remained similar to those based on tested patients. Conclusion The population risk of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC was significantly higher for Maori and Pacifica compared with New Zealand Europeans.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Abramson R., 2017, OVERVIEW TARGETED TH
[2]  
Agena Bioscience, 2016, ONCOFOCUSTM PAN V3 G
[3]  
Ahmad OB-PC, 2001, Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard, V31, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], NCI DICT CANC TERMS
[5]   Development and validation of a predictive model for estimating EGFR mutation probabilities in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in New Zealand [J].
Aye, Phyu Sin ;
Tin, Sandar Tin ;
McKeage, Mark James ;
Khwaounjoo, Prashannata ;
Cavadino, Alana ;
Elwood, J. Mark .
BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
[6]   What is the contribution of smoking and socioeconomic position to ethnic inequalities in mortality in New Zealand? [J].
Blakely, Tony ;
Fawcett, Jackie ;
Hunt, Darren ;
Wilson, Nick .
LANCET, 2006, 368 (9529) :44-52
[7]  
Boyle P, 1991, IARC Sci Publ, P126
[8]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[9]  
CareConnect, TESTSAFE 2020
[10]   Lung cancer mutation profile of EGFR, ALK, and KRAS: Meta-analysis and comparison of never and ever smokers [J].
Chapman, Aaron M. ;
Sun, Kathie Y. ;
Ruestow, Peter ;
Cowan, Dallas M. ;
Madl, Amy K. .
LUNG CANCER, 2016, 102 :122-134