Elucidating the cognitive processes involved in the note-taking effect

被引:2
作者
Lalchandani, Lakshmi A. [1 ]
Healy, Alice F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
cognitive effort; generative processing; note taking; summarization; sustained attention; MEMORY; NOTETAKING; STRATEGIES; ANTIDOTE; LAPTOP; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1002/acp.3985
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
There are three unique cognitive mechanisms during note taking: generative processing, summarization, and sustained attention. Generative processing is active construction of associations between novel information and prior knowledge and experiences. Summarization forces identification of the most pertinent information to create a coherent synopsis. Sustained attention is selectively concentrating on novel information while ignoring irrelevant distraction. This investigation compared the operation of the three cognitive mechanisms in relation to the note-taking effect-the advantage of note taking when there is no opportunity to review the notes. Experiment 1, through measurement of task-relevant and task-irrelevant distraction, showed that sustained attention is positively related and generative processing negatively related to retention. Experiment 2, through an instruction manipulation, showed that generative processing impeded and summarization facilitated retention. Therefore, generative processing cannot account for the note-taking effect. Instead, these results suggest that summarization and sustained attention are the primary cognitive processes underlying the note-taking effect.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1021
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Anderson T.H., 1984, HDB READING RES, V1, P657
[2]   NOTETAKING AND DEPTH OF PROCESSING [J].
BRETZING, BH ;
KULHAVY, RW .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 4 (02) :145-153
[3]   NOTE-TAKING AND PASSAGE STYLE [J].
BRETZING, BH ;
KULHAVY, RW .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 73 (02) :242-250
[4]   Note-Taking With Computers: Exploring Alternative Strategies for Improved Recall [J].
Bui, Dung C. ;
Myerson, Joel ;
Hale, Sandra .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 105 (02) :299-309
[5]   Repeated Testing Produces Superior Transfer of Learning Relative to Repeated Studying [J].
Butler, Andrew C. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2010, 36 (05) :1118-1133
[6]   Memory load as a cognitive antidote to performance decrements in data entry [J].
Chapman, Mary J. ;
Healy, Alice F. ;
Kole, James A. .
MEMORY, 2016, 24 (09) :1182-1196
[7]   LEVELS OF PROCESSING - FRAMEWORK FOR MEMORY RESEARCH [J].
CRAIK, FIM ;
LOCKHART, RS .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1972, 11 (06) :671-684
[8]   LISTENING AND NOTE TAKING [J].
DIVESTA, FJ ;
GRAY, GS .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 63 (01) :8-&
[9]  
Gabrieli J., 2011, 9 00SC INTRO PSYCHOL
[10]   The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments [J].
Gorgolewski, Krzysztof J. ;
Auer, Tibor ;
Calhoun, Vince D. ;
Craddock, R. Cameron ;
Das, Samir ;
Duff, Eugene P. ;
Flandin, Guillaume ;
Ghosh, Satrajit S. ;
Glatard, Tristan ;
Halchenko, Yaroslav O. ;
Handwerker, Daniel A. ;
Hanke, Michael ;
Keator, David ;
Li, Xiangrui ;
Michael, Zachary ;
Maumet, Camille ;
Nichols, B. Nolan ;
Nichols, Thomas E. ;
Pellman, John ;
Poline, Jean-Baptiste ;
Rokem, Ariel ;
Schaefer, Gunnar ;
Sochat, Vanessa ;
Triplett, William ;
Tumer, Jessica A. ;
Varoquaux, Gael ;
Poldrack, Russell A. .
SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2016, 3