Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Iridium Implant Plus External Beam Radiation Therapy With External Beam Radiation Therapy Alone in Node-Negative Locally Advanced Cancer of the Prostate

被引:78
作者
Dayes, Ian S. [1 ]
Parpia, Sameer [3 ]
Gilbert, Jaclyn [2 ]
Julian, Jim A. [3 ]
Davis, Ian R. [4 ]
Levine, Mark N. [1 ]
Sathya, Jinka [5 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Oncol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Anaesthesia, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Juravinski Hosp, Ontario Clin Oncol Grp, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] St Josephs Hlth Ctr, Dept Urol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Mem Univ, Dept Oncol, St John, NF, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2017年 / 99卷 / 01期
关键词
CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the impact on long-term survival from the addition of brachy-therapy to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in patients with prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Between 1992 and 1997, 104 men with cT2-3, surgically staged node-negative prostate cancer were randomized to receive either EBRT (40 Gy/20 fractions) with iridium implant (35 Gy/48 hours) or EBRT alone (66 Gy/33 fractions) to the prostate. According to T stage, Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen level, 60% of patients had high-risk disease. Substantial improvements in biochemical control at 8 years have previously been reported. Additional follow-up was collected on deaths and metastases. Results: Median follow-up was 14 years. Five patients were lost to follow-up. All other patients have been followed a minimum of 13 years. There have been 75 deaths, including 21 from prostate cancer and 25 from second cancers. No patients developing a second cancer have died from prostate cancer. There was no difference in overall survival between the 2 treatment groups: 34 deaths (67%) in the implant arm and 41 (77%) in the EBRT arm (hazard ratio [HR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.59). Similarly, there was no difference in prostate cancerespecific deaths: 9 (18%) patients in the implant arm compared with 12 (23%) in the EBRT arm (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.34-1.87). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients developing metastatic disease: 10 (20%) in the implant arm and 15 (28%) in the EBRT arm (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.32-1.57). Improvements in biochemical control were maintained (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.88). Conclusions: Despite a dramatic reduction of biochemical recurrence rates, the addition of iridium implant to EBRT did not translate into improved overall survival or prostate cancer-specific survival. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 93
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   70 GY VERSUS 80 GY IN LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER: 5-YEAR RESULTS OF GETUG 06 RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
Beckendorf, Veronique ;
Guerif, Stephane ;
Le Prise, Elisabeth ;
Cosset, Jean-Marc ;
Bougnoux, Agnes ;
Chauvet, Bruno ;
Salem, Naji ;
Chapet, Olivier ;
Bourdain, Sylvain ;
Bachaud, Jean-Marc ;
Maingon, Philippe ;
Hannoun-Levi, Jean-Michel ;
Malissard, Luc ;
Simon, Jean-Marc ;
Pommier, Pascal ;
Hay, Men ;
Dubray, Bernard ;
Lagrange, Jean-Leon ;
Luporsi, Elisabeth ;
Bey, Pierre .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (04) :1056-1063
[2]   Age, race, and survival of men with de novo distant metastatic prostate cancer (M1PC). [J].
Bernard, Brandon David ;
Rider, Jennifer R. ;
Sweeney, Christopher ;
Sridhar, Srikala S. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
[3]  
Cox JD, 1997, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V37, P1035
[4]   Randomised pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: long-term follow-up [J].
Creak, A. ;
Hall, E. ;
Horwich, A. ;
Eeles, R. ;
Khoo, V. ;
Huddart, R. ;
Parker, C. ;
Griffin, C. ;
Bidmead, M. ;
Warrington, J. ;
Dearnaley, D. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 109 (03) :651-657
[5]   Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial [J].
Dearnaley, David P. ;
Sydes, Matthew R. ;
Graham, John D. ;
Aird, Edwin G. ;
Bottomley, David ;
Cowan, Richard A. ;
Huddart, Robert A. ;
Jose, Chakiath C. ;
Matthews, John H. L. ;
Millar, Jeremy ;
Moore, A. Rollo ;
Morgan, Rachel C. ;
Russell, J. Martin ;
Scrase, Christopher D. ;
Stephens, Richard J. ;
Syndikus, Isabel ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. B. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (06) :475-487
[6]  
Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology Medical University of Vienna, AM BRACH SOC WEBS
[7]   Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer [J].
Kuban, Deborah A. ;
Tucker, Susan L. ;
Dong, Lei ;
Starkschall, George ;
Huang, Eugene E. ;
Cheung, M. Rex ;
Lee, Andrew K. ;
Pollack, Alan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 70 (01) :67-74
[8]   Impact of biochemical failure on overall survival after radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer in the PSA era [J].
Kupelian, PA ;
Buchsbaum, JC ;
Patel, C ;
Elshaikh, M ;
Reddy, CA ;
Zippe, C ;
Klein, EA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (03) :704-711
[9]   Initial Results of a Phase 3 Randomized Study of High Dose 3DCRT/IMRT versus Standard Dose 3D-CRT/IMRT in Patients Treated for Localized Prostate Cancer (RTOG 0126) [J].
Michalski, J. M. ;
Moughan, J. ;
Purdy, J. A. ;
Bosch, W. R. ;
Bahary, J. ;
Lau, H. ;
Duclos, M. ;
Parliament, M. ;
Morton, G. ;
Hamstra, D. A. ;
Seider, M. ;
Lock, M. I. ;
Patel, M. ;
Gay, H. A. ;
Vigneault, E. ;
Dignam, J. ;
Sandler, H. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 (05) :1263-1263
[10]   Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy [J].
Peeters, STH ;
Heemsbergen, WD ;
Koper, PCM ;
van Putten, WLJ ;
Slot, A ;
Dielwart, MFH ;
Bonfrer, JMG ;
Incrocci, L ;
Lebesque, AV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (13) :1990-1996