A prospective evaluation of the sentinel node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer and correlation of its performance against endometrial cancer risk subtypes

被引:23
作者
Rajanbabu, Anupama [1 ]
Agarwal, Reshu [1 ]
机构
[1] Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Amrita Inst Med Sci, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Kochi 68204, Kerala, India
关键词
Sentinel node mapping; Endometrial cancer; Risk-subtypes; Indocyanine green dye; INDOCYANINE GREEN; LYMPH-NODES; TRIAL; LYMPHADENECTOMY; BRACHYTHERAPY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.017
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Sentinel node mapping is emerging as the alternative to lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. The objective of our study is to validate of the sentinel node mapping surgical algorithm and also to compare the performance of the algorithm against endometrial cancer risk subtypes. Design: This is a prospective interventional study carried out at a Single University teaching hospital. All patients with apparent early stage endometrial cancer who underwent robotic assisted surgical staging were included. Intracervical injection of Indocyanine Green dye and sentinel node identification and biopsy was done for all study patients. The node positive rate when using SLN mapping alone versus SLN mapping algorithm were compared. The node positivity was compared against various risk subtypes of endometrial cancer. Results: 69 patients were included in the study. In 95.7% patients SLN was detected with a bilateral detection rate of 87.9% 10 patients had nodal positivity, among which 7 were identified by SLN mapping alone. The algorithm captured all 10 patients with positive LNs, yielding a node positivity rate of 14.9%, sensitivity and NPV of 100%. For SLN mapping alone the sensitivity was 77.8%, false negative rate (FNR) 22.2%, and NPV 96.6%. In low- and intermediate-risk subtypes SLN mapping as well as algorithm identified all node positive patients, but in high-risk endometrial cancers the SLN mapping technique alone had a sensitivity of 57.1% and false-negative rate of 42.9% when compared with 100% sensitivity for the SLN mapping algorithm. Conclusions: When doing SLN mapping and biopsy during endometrial cancer staging surgery it is essential that the steps mentioned in the SLN mapping algorithm are followed as SLN mapping alone seems to have a limitation in detecting positive nodes especially in high risk subtypes of endometrial cancer. Even with the lack of survival data, based on the performance of SLN mapping surgical algorithm (even if ultrastaging facility is not available), it seems to be a better technique in detecting metastatic nodes, giving prognostic information, and enabling accurate adjuvant treatment. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 80
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The added value of sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer
    Kogan, Liron
    Matanes, Emad
    Wissing, Michel
    Mitric, Cristina
    How, Jeffrey
    Amajoud, Zainab
    Abitbol, Jeremie
    Yasmeen, Amber
    Lopez-Ozuna, Vanessa
    Eisenberg, Neta
    Lau, Susie
    Salvador, Shannon
    Gotlieb, Walter H.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 158 (01) : 84 - 91
  • [22] The Impact of Sentinel Node-Mapping in Staging High-Risk Endometrial Cancer
    Baiocchi, Glauco
    Mantoan, Henrique
    Kumagai, Lillian Yuri
    Goncalves, Bruna Tirapelli
    Badiglian-Filho, Levon
    de Oliveira Menezes, Ademir Narciso
    Faloppa, Carlos Chaves
    De Brot, Louise
    Balieiro Anastacio da Costa, Alexandre Andre
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (13) : 3981 - 3987
  • [23] Meta-analysis of laparoscopy sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer
    Wang, Lijun
    Liu, Fang
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 298 (03) : 505 - 510
  • [24] The Utility of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in High-Grade Endometrial Cancer
    Tanner, Edward J.
    Ojalvo, Laureen
    Stone, Rebecca Lynn
    Levinson, Kimberly
    Temkin, Sarah M.
    Murdock, Tricia
    Vang, Russell
    Sinno, Abdulrahman K.
    Fader, Amanda Nickles
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 (07) : 1416 - 1421
  • [25] Controversy over sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer
    Paredes, P.
    Diaz-Feijoo, B.
    Aguilar Galan, E., V
    de Matias Martinez, M.
    Fuertes Cabero, S.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE MEDICINA NUCLEAR E IMAGEN MOLECULAR, 2022, 41 (06): : 373 - 379
  • [26] Usefulness of sentinel lymph node mapping using indocyanine green and fluorescent imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer
    Lee, Geon-Woo
    Park, Jeong-Yeol
    Kim, Dae-Yeon
    Suh, Dae-Shik
    Kim, Jong-Hyeok
    Kim, Yong-Man
    Kim, Young-Tak
    Nam, Joo-Hyun
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 41 (04) : 605 - 611
  • [27] Comparing indocyanine green, technetium, and blue dye for sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer
    How, J.
    Gotlieb, W. H.
    Press, J. Z.
    Abitbol, J.
    Pelmus, M.
    Ferenczy, A.
    Probst, S.
    Gotlieb, R.
    Brin, S.
    Lau, S.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 137 (03) : 436 - 442
  • [28] Reproducibility of sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer by ICG fundic & cervical injection
    Gorostidi, Mikel
    Ruiz, Ruben
    Jaunarena, Ibon
    Cobas, Paloma
    Lekuona, Arantxa
    Diez-Itza, Irene
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 42 (06) : 1285 - 1290
  • [29] Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: Current evidence and practice
    Salman, Lina
    Cusimano, Maria C.
    Marchocki, Zibi
    Ferguson, Sarah E.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 129 (01) : 117 - 119
  • [30] Current status of sentinel lymph node mapping in the management of endometrial cancer
    Robova, Helena
    Rob, Lukas
    Halaska, Michael Jiri
    Pluta, Marek
    Skapa, Petr
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2013, 13 (01) : 55 - 61