What drives the governance of ridesharing? A fuzzy-set QCA of local regulations in China

被引:26
作者
Li, Yanwei [1 ]
Ma, Liang [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Normal Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Renmin Univ China, Sch Publ Adm & Policy, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Governance; Ridesharing; Fuzzy set; QCA; China;
D O I
10.1007/s11077-019-09359-x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Ridesharing or ride-hailing services have received substantial attention from scholars and practitioners around the world, and it has become an urgent issue for the government to find solutions to mitigate their negative externalities and to provide room for their development. Since the Chinese central government legalized ridesharing in 2016, cities across provinces have adopted dissimilar strategies in governing ridesharing. In this contribution, we use a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis approach to explain the variations in regulatory strategies adopted by 25 Chinese capital cities to govern ridesharing. Our study has identified seven paths to explain both the stringent and loose regulation of municipalities on ridesharing. These findings enrich our understanding of the choices of government strategies in regulating ridesharing. We conclude that regulators should adopt a network governance approach to achieve a win-win outcome in governing ridesharing.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 624
页数:24
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review
    Agatz, Niels
    Erera, Alan
    Savelsbergh, Martin
    Wang, Xing
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 223 (02) : 295 - 303
  • [2] The Sustainability of Shared Mobility in London: The Dilemma for Governance
    Akyelken, Nihan
    Banister, David
    Givoni, Moshe
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (02)
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, AGENDAS INSTABILITY
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, Harper Collins p
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1707 U CAL I TRANSP
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, BOSTON COLL INT COMP
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2015, The University of Chicago Law Review Dialogue
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2018, E-Government
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2014, BERKELEY TECH LJ, DOI DOI 10.15779/Z38NM5G
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2007, THEORIES DEMOCRATIC, DOI DOI 10.1057/9780230625006