Effects of L-carnitine supplementation in diets of broiler chickens

被引:0
作者
Azizi-Chekosari, M. [1 ]
Bouyeh, M. [1 ]
Seidavi, A. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Rash Branch, Rasht, Iran
来源
JOURNAL OF THE HELLENIC VETERINARY MEDICAL SOCIETY | 2021年 / 72卷 / 01期
关键词
Dietary supplements; fat burning; triglycerides; cholesterol; L-carnitine; BLOOD BIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS; GROWTH-PERFORMANCE; CARCASS TRAITS; LYSINE-METHIONINE; IMMUNE-RESPONSES; QUALITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
L-carnitine is a nutritional supplement having fat-burning property and plays an important role in lipid metabolism, energy release, and also improve the production yield, immunity and blood constitute. This paper reviews the effects of L-carnitine on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of broilers. According to the reviewed literature, the application of L-carnitine (50-200 mg/kg) has no significant effect on the growth performance, however, using L-carnitine as much as 300-800 mg/kg resulted to an improvement in the body weight (2226.00-2575.00 g) compared to the control chicks (1998.40-2338.75 g). The feed conversion ratios of the chickens fed the same amount of L-carnitine were 1.66-1.86 kg/kg, which was improved in comparison with the control chicks (1.87-2.09 kg/kg). Abdominal fat of the broiler chickens fed 50-900 mg/kg L-carnitine was 0.98-1.75%, which is lower than the control chicks (1.79-2.16%). For immunity, the antibody titers against the Newcastle virus in the chickens fed 250 mg/kg L-carnitine was between 4.6- 5.5 which is more than control chicks (4.3-5.2). The antibody titer against the influenza virus in the chickens fed the same amount of L-carnitine was between 5.6-6.3, which was more than the control chicks (4.3-5.8). The use of 100-600 mg/kg L-carnitine could reduce triglyceride (90-104.4 mg/dL) compared to the control chicks (125-104.7 mg/dL) and also reduced the cholesterol (109-115 mg/dL) compared to the control chicks (129.25-131 mg/dL). The application of 100-600 mg/kg L-carnitine also could reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) from 19.1-72.2 mg/dL to 16.5-49.0 mg/dL. However, the application of 100-900 mg/kg L-carnitine had no significant effect on the sensory characteristics of broiler chicken meat. In general, it can be concluded that L-carnitine can be used as a dietary supplement on the health of broiler chickens without any negative effect on growth performance.
引用
收藏
页码:2611 / 2628
页数:18
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Abedpour A, 2017, IRAN J APPL ANIM SCI, V7, P147
[2]   IMPACT OF L-CARNITINE SUPPLEMENTATION ON GROWTH OF BROILER CHICKEN THROUGH DETERMINATION OF CHANGES IN THE EXPRESSION OF CAT2, MYOD AND MYF5 GENES [J].
Abouzed, Tarek K. ;
Dorghamm, Doaa A. ;
Kahilo, Khaled A. ;
Elkattawy, Azza M. ;
Nassef, Eldsokey ;
El-sawy, Hanan B. .
SLOVENIAN VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2019, 56 :665-672
[3]   L-carnitine and its functional effects in poultry nutrition [J].
Adabi, Sh Golzar ;
Cooper, R. G. ;
Ceylan, N. ;
Corduk, M. .
WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2011, 67 (02) :277-296
[4]  
Akbari Azad G., 2010, Journal of veterinary clinical research, V1, P7
[5]  
Ardekani H. M., 2012, Annals of Biological Research, V3, P1085
[6]  
Arslan C, 2018, REV MED VET-TOULOUSE, V169, P130
[7]   Carcass Traits and Immune Response of Broiler Chickens Fed Dietary L-Carnitine, Coenzyme Q10 and Ractopamine [J].
Asadi, H. ;
Sadeghi, A. A. ;
Eila, N. ;
Aminafshar, M. .
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF POULTRY SCIENCE, 2016, 18 (04) :677-681
[8]   Effect of supplemental lipotropic factors on performance, immune responses, serum metabolites and liver health in broiler chicks fed on high-energy diets [J].
Azadmanesh, V. ;
Jahanian, R. .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 195 :92-100
[9]  
Babazadeh Aghdam A., 2015, J. Vet. Res., V70, P341
[10]   Dietary L-carnitine supplementation enhances the lipopolysaccharide-induced acute phase protein response in broiler chickens [J].
Buyse, Johan ;
Swennen, Quirine ;
Niewold, Theo A. ;
Klasing, Kirk C. ;
Janssens, Geert P. J. ;
Baumgartner, Max ;
Goddeeris, Bruno M. .
VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY, 2007, 118 (1-2) :154-159