Impact of donor age on liver transplant outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of the SRTR database

被引:13
作者
Zhou, Jie [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Huang, Zhichao [1 ]
Chen, Zheng [1 ]
Xu, Fangshen [1 ]
Tong, Rongliang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zheng, Shusen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Div Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Dept Surg, Sch Med,Affiliated Hosp 1, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] NHC Key Lab Combined Multiorgan Transplantat, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci 2019RU019, Key Lab Diag & Treatment Organ Transplantat, Res Unit Collaborat Diag & Treatment Hepatobiliar, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Res Ctr Diag & Treatment Hepatobiliary Dis, Key Lab Organ Transplantat, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Liver transplantation; Donor age; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Outcome; SRTR; RISK; RECURRENCE; MORTALITY; WAITLIST; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-021-01786-6
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Donor age is an important predictor for liver transplant recipients. Studies have not fully explored its impact on transplant outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients as well as its involvement in tumor recurrence. Methods HCC patients who received liver transplants during 2010-2017 from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database were included. The recipients were divided into four groups based on donor age: I (<= 34 years), II (35-49 years), III (50-64 years), and IV (>= 65 years). Transplant outcomes, including the overall survival (OS), tumor recurrence, and risks, were evaluated. Results A total of 13,276 HCC recipients were included in this study. Statistical significant differences were observed in OS among the four groups. The best 5-year survival was 76.0% in group I, followed by 73.5% in group II, 72.8% in group III, and 69.2% in group IV (P < 0.001). However, the liver-specific survival did not differ among these groups (P = 0.260). Donor age was found to be the independent predictor of OS after adjusting for other variables (P < 0.001, ref. group I; 1.087 (0.979-1.208) for group II, P = 0.119; 1.124 (1.015-1.246) for group III, P = 0.025; 1.395 (1.215-1.602) for group IV, P < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, OS was significantly different in recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), but there was no significant difference for recipients with hepatitis B virus (HBV), alcoholic liver diseases and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The post-transplant cumulative tumor recurrence rates were similar among the four groups (P = 0.382). Conclusions Older donor age was associated with decreased OS but not liver-specific survival as well as post-transplant tumor recurrence in HCC recipients. Donor age also had different effects in patients with different underlying liver diseases.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Our experience in liver transplantation in patients over 65 yr of age [J].
Bilbao, Itxarone ;
Dopazo, Cristina ;
Lazaro, Jose Luis ;
Castells, Luis ;
Escartin, Alfredo ;
Lopez, Inigo ;
Sapisochin, Gonzalo ;
Balsells, Joaquin ;
Margarit, Carlos .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 22 (01) :82-88
[2]   Validation of the donor risk index in orthotopic liver transplantation within the Eurotransplant region [J].
Blok, Joris J. ;
Braat, Andries E. ;
Adam, Rene ;
Burroughs, Andrew K. ;
Putter, Hein ;
Kooreman, Nigel G. ;
Rahmel, Axel O. ;
Porte, Robert J. ;
Rogiers, Xavier ;
Ringers, Jan .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (01) :113-120
[3]   The Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index in Liver Transplantation: ET-DRI [J].
Braat, A. E. ;
Blok, J. J. ;
Putter, H. ;
Adam, R. ;
Burroughs, A. K. ;
Rahmel, A. O. ;
Porte, R. J. ;
Rogiers, X. ;
Ringers, J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 (10) :2789-2796
[4]   Long-term results of liver transplantation in patients 60 years of age and older [J].
Collins, BH ;
Pirsch, JD ;
Becker, YT ;
Hanaway, MJ ;
Van der Werf, WJ ;
D'Alessandro, AM ;
Knechtle, SJ ;
Odorico, JS ;
Leverson, G ;
Musat, A ;
Armbrust, M ;
Becker, BN ;
Sollinger, HW ;
Kalayoglu, M .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 70 (05) :780-783
[5]   The efficacy of direct anti-HCV drugs improves early post-liver transplant survival and induces significant changes in waiting list composition [J].
Crespo, Gonzalo ;
Trota, Nuria ;
Londono, Maria-Carlota ;
Mauro, Ezequiel ;
Baliellas, Carme ;
Castells, Lluis ;
Castellote, Jose ;
Tort, Jaume ;
Forns, Xavier ;
Navasa, Miquel .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 69 (01) :11-17
[6]   Pushing the donor limits: Deceased donor liver transplantation using organs from octogenarian donors [J].
Diaz Jaime, Francia ;
Berenguer, Marina .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 23 :S22-S26
[7]   Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: The concept of a donor risk index [J].
Feng, S ;
Goodrich, NP ;
Bragg-Gresham, JL ;
Dykstra, DM ;
Punch, JD ;
DebRoy, MA ;
Greenstein, SM ;
Merion, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (04) :783-790
[8]   Changes in the Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, and Alcoholic Liver Disease Among Patients With Cirrhosis or Liver Failure on the Waitlist for Liver Transplantation [J].
Goldberg, David ;
Ditah, Ivo C. ;
Saeian, Kia ;
Lalehzari, Mona ;
Aronsohn, Andrew ;
Gorospe, Emmanuel C. ;
Charlton, Michael .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 152 (05) :1090-+
[9]   D-MELD, a Simple Predictor of Post Liver Transplant Mortality for Optimization of Donor/Recipient Matching [J].
Halldorson, J. B. ;
Bakthavatsalam, R. ;
Fix, O. ;
Reyes, J. D. ;
Perkins, J. D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 (02) :318-326
[10]   A comprehensive risk assessment of mortality following donation after cardiac death liver transplant - An analysis of the national registry [J].
Jay, Colleen ;
Ladner, Daniela ;
Wang, Edward ;
Lyuksemburg, Vadim ;
Kang, Raymond ;
Chang, Yaojen ;
Feinglass, Joseph ;
Holl, Jane L. ;
Abecassis, Michael ;
Skaro, Anton I. .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 55 (04) :808-813