Evaluating collinearity effects on species distribution models: An approach based on virtual species simulation

被引:315
作者
de Marco Junior, Paulo [1 ]
Nobrega, Caroline Correa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Goias, Dept Ecol, Goiania, Go, Brazil
[2] IPAM, Belem, Para, Brazil
关键词
SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS; GEOGRAPHICAL-DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION; BIOTIC INTERACTIONS; POTENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONS; PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCE; PRINCIPAL-COMPONENTS; CONSERVATION STATUS; STOPPING RULES; NICHE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0202403
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The increasing use of species distribution modeling (SDM) has raised new concerns regarding the inaccuracies, misunderstanding, and misuses of this important tool. One of those possible pitfalls - collinearity among environmental predictors - is assumed as an important source of model uncertainty, although it has not been subjected to a detailed evaluation in recent SDM studies. It is expected that collinearity will increase uncertainty in model parameters and decrease statistical power. Here we use a virtual species approach to compare models built using subsets of PCA-derived variables with models based on the original highly correlated climate variables. Moreover, we evaluated whether modelling algorithms and species data characteristics generate models with varying sensitivity to collinearity. As expected, collinearity among predictors decreases the efficiency and increases the uncertainty of species distribution models. Nevertheless, the intensity of the effect varied according to the algorithm properties: more complex procedures behaved better than simple envelope models. This may support the claim that complex models such as Maxent take advantage of existing collinearity in finding the best set of parameters. The interaction of the different factors with species characteristics (centroid and tolerance in environmental space) highlighted the importance of the so-called "idiosyncrasy in species responses" to model efficiency, but differences in prevalence may represent a better explanation. However, even models with low accuracy to predict suitability of individual cells may provide meaningful information on the estimation of range-size, a key species-trait for macroecological studies. We concluded that the use of PCA-derived variables is advised both to control the negative effects of collinearity and as a more objective solution for the problem of variable selection in studies dealing with large number of species with heterogeneous responses to environmental variables.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 124 条
[41]   Ensemble modelling of species distribution: the effects of geographical and environmental ranges [J].
Grenouillet, Gael ;
Buisson, Laetitia ;
Casajus, Nicolas ;
Lek, Sovan .
ECOGRAPHY, 2011, 34 (01) :9-17
[42]   Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models [J].
Guisan, A ;
Thuiller, W .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2005, 8 (09) :993-1009
[43]   Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size [J].
Guisan, Antoine ;
Graham, Catherine H. ;
Elith, Jane ;
Huettmann, Falk .
DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2007, 13 (03) :332-340
[44]   Sample sizes and model comparison metrics for species distribution models [J].
Hanberry, B. B. ;
He, H. S. ;
Dey, D. C. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2012, 227 :29-33
[45]   Geographical patterns in prediction errors of species distribution models [J].
Hanspach, Jan ;
Kuehn, Ingolf ;
Schweiger, Oliver ;
Pompe, Sven ;
Klotz, Stefan .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2011, 20 (05) :779-788
[46]   Inference from presence-only data; the ongoing controversy [J].
Hastie, Trevor ;
Fithian, Will .
ECOGRAPHY, 2013, 36 (08) :864-867
[47]   Does the interpolation accuracy of species distribution models come at the expense of transferability? [J].
Heikkinen, Risto K. ;
Marmion, Mathieu ;
Luoto, Miska .
ECOGRAPHY, 2012, 35 (03) :276-288
[48]   The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods [J].
Hernandez, Pilar A. ;
Graham, Catherine H. ;
Master, Lawrence L. ;
Albert, Deborah L. .
ECOGRAPHY, 2006, 29 (05) :773-785
[49]   Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas [J].
Hijmans, RJ ;
Cameron, SE ;
Parra, JL ;
Jones, PG ;
Jarvis, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2005, 25 (15) :1965-1978
[50]   Cross-validation of species distribution models: removing spatial sorting bias and calibration with a null model [J].
Hijmans, Robert J. .
ECOLOGY, 2012, 93 (03) :679-688