Daily Left Prefrontal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder A Sham-Controlled Randomized Trial

被引:738
作者
George, Mark S. [1 ]
Lisanby, Sarah H. [3 ]
Avery, David [4 ]
McDonald, William M. [5 ]
Durkalski, Valerie [2 ]
Pavlicova, Martina [6 ]
Anderson, Berry
Nahas, Ziad
Bulow, Peter [3 ]
Zarkowski, Paul [4 ]
Holtzheimer, Paul E., III [5 ]
Schwartz, Theresa [6 ]
Sackeim, Harold A. [7 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Inst Psychiat, Brain Stimulat Div, Dept Psychiat, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Biometry, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, New York State Psychiat Inst, Div Brain Stimulat & Therapeut Modulat, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Emory Univ, Dept Psychiat, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[6] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Biostat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[7] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
STAR-ASTERISK-D; TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION; FAILED MEDICATION TREATMENTS; MOTOR CORTEX EXCITABILITY; ELECTROCONVULSIVE-THERAPY; ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; ADAPTIVE DESIGNS; DRUG DEVELOPMENT;
D O I
10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.46
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Context: Daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been studied as a potential treatment for depression, but previous work had mixed outcomes and did not adequately mask sham conditions. Objective: To test whether daily left prefrontal rTMS safely and effectively treats major depressive disorder. Design: Prospective, multisite, randomized, active sham-controlled (1: 1 randomization), duration-adaptive design with 3 weeks of daily weekday treatment (fixed-dose phase) followed by continued blinded treatment for up to another 3 weeks in improvers. Setting: Four US university hospital clinics. Patients: Approximately 860 outpatients were screened, yielding 199 antidepressant drug-free patients with unipolar nonpsychotic major depressive disorder. Intervention: We delivered rTMS to the left prefrontal cortex at 120% motor threshold (10 Hz, 4-second train duration, and 26-second intertrain interval) for 37.5 minutes (3000 pulses per session) using a figure-eight solid-core coil. Sham rTMS used a similar coil with a metal insert blocking the magnetic field and scalp electrodes that delivered matched somatosensory sensations. Main Outcome Measure: In the intention-to-treat sample (n=190), remission rates were compared for the 2 treatment arms using logistic regression and controlling for site, treatment resistance, age, and duration of the current depressive episode. Results: Patients, treaters, and raters were effectively masked. Minimal adverse effects did not differ by treatment arm, with an 88% retention rate (90% sham and 86% active). Primary efficacy analysis revealed a significant effect of treatment on the proportion of remitters (14.1% active rTMS and 5.1% sham) (P=.02). The odds of attaining remission were 4.2 times greater with active rTMS than with sham (95% confidence interval, 1.32-13.24). The number needed to treat was 12. Most remitters had low antidepressant treatment resistance. Almost 30% of patients remitted in the open-label follow-up (30.2% originally active and 29.6% sham). Conclusion: Daily left prefrontal rTMS as monotherapy produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful antidepressant therapeutic effects greater than sham.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 516
页数:10
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Tolerability and safety of high daily doses of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy young men [J].
Anderson, B ;
Mishory, A ;
Nahas, Z ;
Borckardt, JJ ;
Yamanaka, K ;
Rastogi, K ;
George, MS .
JOURNAL OF ECT, 2006, 22 (01) :49-53
[2]   Focal electrical stimulation as a sham control for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Does it truly mimic the cutaneous sensation and pain of active prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation? [J].
Arana, Ashley B. ;
Borckardt, Jeffery J. ;
Ricci, Raffaella ;
Anderson, Berry ;
Li, Xingbao ;
Linder, Katherine J. ;
Long, James ;
Sackeim, Harold A. ;
George, Mark S. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2008, 1 (01) :44-51
[3]  
BALDESSARINI RJ, 1990, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V47, P191
[4]   Development and evaluation of a portable sham transcranial magnetic stimulation system [J].
Borckardt, Jeffrey J. ;
Walker, John ;
Branham, R. Kyle ;
Rydin-Gray, Sofia ;
Hunter, Caroline ;
Beeson, Heather ;
Reeves, Scott T. ;
Madan, Alok ;
Sackeim, Harold ;
George, Mark S. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2008, 1 (01) :52-59
[5]   Estimating resting motor thresholds in transcranial magnetic stimulation research and practice: A computer simulation evaluation of best methods [J].
Borckardt, Jeffrey J. ;
Nahas, Ziad ;
Koola, Jejo ;
George, Mark S. .
JOURNAL OF ECT, 2006, 22 (03) :169-175
[6]   Neuropsychiatric applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation: a meta analysis [J].
Burt, T ;
Lisanby, SH ;
Sackeim, HA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 5 (01) :73-103
[7]   Cost-effectiveness of clinical interventions for reducing the global burden of bipolar disorder [J].
Chisholm, D ;
Van Ommeren, M ;
Ayuso-Mateos, JL ;
Saxena, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 187 :559-567
[8]   Three and six-month outcome following courses of either ECT or rTMS in a population of severely depressed individuals - Preliminary report [J].
Dannon, PN ;
Dolberg, OT ;
Schreiber, S ;
Grunhaus, L .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 51 (08) :687-690
[9]   State of the art: Physiology of transcranial motor cortex stimulation [J].
Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo ;
Ziemann, Ulf ;
Lemon, Roger N. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2008, 1 (04) :345-362
[10]   An open study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression with Parkinson's disease [J].
Epstein, Charles M. ;
Evatt, Marian L. ;
Funk, Agnes ;
Girard-Siqueira, Lhys ;
Lupel, Nichole ;
Slaughter, Larisa ;
Athar, Saima ;
Green, Joanne ;
McDonald, William ;
DeLong, Mahlon R. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 118 (10) :2189-2194