Comparison of Focus Groups on Cancer and Employment Conducted Face to Face or by Telephone

被引:30
作者
Frazier, Linda M. [1 ]
Miller, Virginia A. [1 ]
Horbelt, Douglas V. [1 ]
Delmore, James E.
Miller, Brigitte E. [2 ]
Paschal, Angelia M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med Wichita, Wichita, KS 67214 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[3] Univ Kansas, Dept Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, Sch Med Wichita, Wichita, KS 67214 USA
关键词
cancer; psychosocial aspects; focus groups; group interaction; technology; use in research; workplace; SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY; BREAST-CANCER; WORK; SURVIVORS; HEALTH; COMMUNICATION; PHENOMENOLOGY; DISCLOSURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/1049732310361466
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Findings from telephone focus groups have not been compared previously to findings from face-to-face focus groups. We conducted four telephone focus groups and five face-to-face focus groups in which a single moderator used the same open-ended questions and discussion facilitation techniques. This comparison was part of a larger study to gain a better understanding of employment experiences after diagnosis of gynecologic cancer. Offering the telephone option made it easier to recruit women from rural areas and geographically distant cities. Interaction between participants occurred in both types of focus group. Content analysis revealed that similar elements of the employment experience after cancer diagnosis were described by telephone and face-to-face participants. Participants disclosed certain emotionally sensitive experiences only in the telephone focus groups. Telephone focus groups provide useful data and can reduce logistical barriers to research participation. Visual anonymity might help some participants feel more comfortable discussing certain personal issues.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 627
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Appleton S, 2000, PSYCHO-ONCOL, V9, P511, DOI 10.1002/1099-1611(200011/12)9:6<511::AID-PON469>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-E
[3]   Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective [J].
Bandura, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :1-26
[4]   Unmet psychosocial needs of Pennsylvanians with cancer: 1986-2005 [J].
Barg, Frances K. ;
Cronholm, Peter F. ;
Straton, Joseph B. ;
Keddem, Shimrit ;
Knott, Kathryn ;
Grater, Joyce ;
Houts, Peter ;
Palmer, Steven C. .
CANCER, 2007, 110 (03) :631-639
[5]  
Breitkopf Carmen Radecki, 2004, Herpes, V11, P4
[6]   Using written vignettes in focus groups among older adults to discuss oral health as a sensitive topic [J].
Brondani, Mario A. ;
MacEntee, Michael I. ;
Bryant, S. Ross ;
O'Neill, Brian .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2008, 18 (08) :1145-1153
[7]   THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE [J].
CELLA, DF ;
TULSKY, DS ;
GRAY, G ;
SARAFIAN, B ;
LINN, E ;
BONOMI, A ;
SILBERMAN, M ;
YELLEN, SB ;
WINICOUR, P ;
BRANNON, J ;
ECKBERG, K ;
LLOYD, S ;
PURL, S ;
BLENDOWSKI, C ;
GOODMAN, M ;
BARNICLE, M ;
STEWART, I ;
MCHALE, M ;
BONOMI, P ;
KAPLAN, E ;
TAYLOR, S ;
THOMAS, CR ;
HARRIS, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) :570-579
[8]   Telephone focus groups: An emerging method in public health research [J].
Cooper, CP ;
Jorgensen, CM ;
Merritt, TL .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2003, 12 (10) :945-951
[9]  
Crabtree B., 1999, Doing Qualitative Research, DOI DOI 10.1046/J.0966-0429.2001.00289.X
[10]  
Creswell J. W., 2018, DESIGNING CONDUCTING