Globalization, renewable energy consumption, and agricultural production impacts on ecological footprint in emerging countries: using quantile regression approach

被引:48
作者
Salari, Taghi Ebrahimi [1 ]
Roumiani, Ahmad [2 ]
Kazemzadeh, Emad [1 ]
机构
[1] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Mashhad 91735, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[2] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Dept Geog, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
关键词
Renewable energy; Environmental degradation; Agriculture; Quantile regression; Responsible Editor; Nicholas Apergis; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; TRADE; URBANIZATION; RESOURCES; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-14204-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nowadays, paying attention to globalization and the consumption of renewable energy on the ecological footprint is one of the most important issues in the world. In the age of globalization, all countries are trying to prevent the spread of ecological degradation by enacting laws and regulations at the national level and regulating international agreements. This study investigates the effect of explanatory variables of globalization, renewable energy consumption, and agricultural production on the ecological footprint in emerging countries using fixed-effect panel quantile regression of 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th in the period 2002 to 2016. The results showed that the consumption of renewable energy at all levels except the 25th quantile has a positive and significant effect on the ecological footprint; this effect is more in higher quantiles. Globalization in all quantiles has a negative and significant impact on the ecological footprint and has had the most excellent effect among other explanatory variables. Agricultural production variable at the 25th and 50th quantile levels had the most significant and positive effect on the ecological footprint. Therefore, it can be concluded that the increase in agricultural production, income, renewable energy consumption, population, and trade openness can lead to increased environmental degradation. However, the effects of globalization have had the most negligible negative impact on the ecological footprint.
引用
收藏
页码:49627 / 49641
页数:15
相关论文
共 85 条
[31]   Effects of globalisation on carbon footprints of products [J].
Herrmann, I. T. ;
Hauschild, M. Z. .
CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 58 (01) :13-16
[32]   The Causal Connection of Natural Resources and Globalization with Energy Consumption in Top Asian Countries: Evidence from a Nonparametric Causality-in-Quantile Approach [J].
Hussain, Hafezali Iqbal ;
Haseeb, Muhammad ;
Tvaronaviciene, Manuela ;
Mihardjo, Leonardus W. W. ;
Jermsittiparsert, Kittisak .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (09)
[33]  
Hynes W., 2012, DOC DCD DAC, V27
[34]   Dynamic linkages amongst ecological footprints, fossil fuel energy consumption and globalization: an empirical analysis [J].
Ibrahiem, Dalia M. ;
Hanafy, Shaimaa A. .
MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2020, 31 (06) :1549-1568
[35]   Environmental quality effects of income, energy prices and trade: The role of renewable energy consumption in G-7 countries [J].
Ike, George N. ;
Usman, Ojonugwa ;
Alola, Andrew Adewale ;
Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 721
[36]  
Irfan ZB, 2021, WATER PRODUCTIVITY J, V1, P51, DOI [10.22034/WPJ.2021.263286.1022, DOI 10.22034/WPJ.2021.263286.1022]
[37]   Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data [J].
Kao, C .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1999, 90 (01) :1-44
[38]   Sustaining natural resources in a changing environment: evidence, policy and impact [J].
Kattumuri, Ruth .
CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (01) :1-16
[39]   Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach [J].
Kirikkaleli, Dervis ;
Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday ;
Khan, Zeeshan ;
Ali, Shahid .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (11) :14009-14017
[40]   Inference on the quantile regression process [J].
Koenker, R ;
Xiao, ZJ .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (04) :1583-1612