Determination of estrogenic activity by LYES-assay (yeast estrogen screen-assay assisted by enzymatic digestion with lyticase)

被引:64
作者
Schultis, T [1 ]
Metzger, JW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Sanitary Engn Water Qual & Solid Waste Manag, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
LYES-assay; YES-assay; E-Screen-assay; fluorescence polarization; endocrine disruption; estrogenic activity;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.06.027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In order to enhance the sensitivity and the speed of the yeast estrogen screen (YES)-assay, which has been established in many laboratories for the determination of estrogenic activity of compounds and environmental samples, the LYES-assay., a modified version of the YES-assay including a digestion step with the enzyme lyticase, was developed. With the LYES-assay the estrogenic activities of natural (17beta-estradiol E2 and estrone), synthetic (17alpha-ethinylestradiol EE2) and pharmaceutical estrogens (diethylstilbestrol DES) as well as xenoestrogens (4-nonylphenol NP and five parabens) were determined and compared with the results obtained by other in vitro-assays namely the conventional YES-assay, the E-Screen-assay (MCF-7 breast tumor cell proliferation) and a receptor binding-assay (RB) with human estrogen receptors hER-alpha and hER-beta. In the case of E2 the LYES-assay had a significantly lower limit of quantification (LOQ) than the conventional YES-assay and ever. two orders of magnitude lower than the RB-assay. Compared to the E-Screen-assay the LOQ of the LYES-assay was almost one order of magnitude higher. The time required to perform the LYES-assay was as little as seven hours compared to three to five days for the conventional YES-assay. Thus, the LYES-assay is a very good alternative to existing estrogenic in vitro-assays, since it has a good sensitivity, is cheap and much faster than the other assays. (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1649 / 1655
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Endocrine-modulating substances in the environment estrogenic effects of pharmaceutical products [J].
Arcand-Hoy, LD ;
Nimrod, AC ;
Benson, WH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY, 1998, 17 (02) :139-158
[2]   Safety evaluation of phytosterol esters.: Part 1.: Assessment of oestrogenicity using a combination of in vivo and in vitro assays [J].
Baker, VA ;
Hepburn, PA ;
Kennedy, SJ ;
Jones, PA ;
Lea, LJ ;
Sumpter, JP ;
Ashby, J .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1999, 37 (01) :13-22
[3]   Issues arising when interpreting results from an in vitro assay for estrogenic activity [J].
Beresford, N ;
Routledge, EJ ;
Harris, CA ;
Sumpter, JP .
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 162 (01) :22-33
[4]   Rapid screening of environmental chemicals for estrogen receptor binding capacity [J].
Bolger, R ;
Wiese, TE ;
Ervin, K ;
Nestich, S ;
Checovich, W .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 106 (09) :551-557
[5]  
*DIN, 3264519945 DIN
[6]   Quantitative comparisons of in vitro assays for estrogenic activities [J].
Fang, H ;
Tong, WD ;
Perkins, R ;
Soto, AM ;
Prechtl, NV ;
Sheehan, DM .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2000, 108 (08) :723-729
[7]   Evaluation of chemicals with endocrine modulating activity in a yeast-based steroid hormone receptor gene transcription assay [J].
Gaido, KW ;
Leonard, LS ;
Lovell, S ;
Gould, JC ;
Babai, D ;
Portier, CJ ;
McDonnell, DP .
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 143 (01) :205-212
[8]  
Körner W, 1999, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V225, P33
[9]   Comparison of in vivo and in vitro reporter gene assays for short-term screening of estrogenic activity [J].
Legler, J ;
Zeinstra, LM ;
Schuitemaker, F ;
Lanser, PH ;
Bogerd, J ;
Brouwer, A ;
Vethaak, AD ;
De Voogt, P ;
Murk, AJ ;
Van der Burg, B .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 36 (20) :4410-4415
[10]  
Montagnani DB, 1996, J CHART INST WATER E, V10, P399