Age differences in the effects of conceptual integration training on resource allocation in sentence processing

被引:25
作者
Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L. [1 ]
Noh, Soo Rim
Shake, Matthew C.
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Educ Psychol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
Text memory; Metacognition; Resource allocation; Reading; Ageing; WORKING-MEMORY; TEXT COMPREHENSION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; EYE-MOVEMENTS; WRAP-UP; YOUNGER; OLDER; KNOWLEDGE; ADULTS; CLAUSE;
D O I
10.1080/17470210903330983
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research examined age differences in the accommodation of reading strategies as a consequence of explicit instruction in conceptual integration. In Experiment 1, young, middle-aged, and older adults read sentences for delayed recall using a moving-window method. Readers in an experimental group received instruction in making conceptual links during reading while readers in a control group were simply encouraged to allocate effort. Regression analysis to decompose word-by-word reading times in each condition isolated the time allocated to conceptual processing at the point in the text at which new concepts were introduced, as well as at clause and sentence boundaries. While younger adults responded to instructions by differentially allocating effort to sentence wrap-up, older adults allocated effort to intrasentence wrap-up and on new concepts as they were introduced, suggesting that older readers optimized their allocation of effort to linguistic computations for textbase construction within their processing capacity. Experiment 2 verified that conceptual integration training improved immediate recall among older readers as a consequence of engendering allocation to conceptual processing.
引用
收藏
页码:1430 / 1455
页数:26
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   PERFORMANCE THEORIES FOR SENTENCE CODING - SOME QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE [J].
AARONSON, D ;
SCARBOROUGH, HS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1976, 2 (01) :56-70
[2]  
Aaronson D., 1984, NEW METHODS READING, P31, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780429505379-3
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1983, The modularity of mind
[4]  
Caplan D, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P77
[5]   Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger [J].
Christianson, K ;
Hollingworth, A ;
Halliwell, JF ;
Ferreira, F .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 42 (04) :368-407
[6]   Younger and older adults' "good-enough" interpretations of garden-path sentences [J].
Christianson, Kiel ;
Williams, Carrick C. ;
Zacks, Rose T. ;
Ferreira, Fernanda .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2006, 42 (02) :205-238
[7]  
Chute D.L., 1996, POWERLABORATORY
[8]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY AND READING [J].
DANEMAN, M ;
CARPENTER, PA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1980, 19 (04) :450-466
[9]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN INTEGRATING INFORMATION BETWEEN AND WITHIN SENTENCES [J].
DANEMAN, M ;
CARPENTER, PA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1983, 9 (04) :561-584
[10]   An investigation of concurrent ERP and self-paced reading methodologies [J].
Ditman, Tali ;
Holcomb, Phillip J. ;
Kuperberg, Gina R. .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 44 (06) :927-935