The Safety and Efficacy of Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adjacent Segment Disease in a Cohort of 44 Patients

被引:8
作者
Screven, Ryan [1 ]
Pressman, Elliot [1 ]
Rao, Gautam [1 ]
Freeman, Thomas B. [1 ]
Alikhani, Puya [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Neurosurg & Brain Repair, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
Adjacent segment disease; Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Minimally invasive; Revision; Spine; MAJOR VASCULAR INJURY; SPINAL-FUSION; UNITED-STATES; RISK-FACTORS; BLOOD-LOSS; SURGERY; DEGENERATION; PREVALENCE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.046
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
-BACKGROUND: A mainstay of treatment for symptom-atic adjacent segment disease (ASD) has consisted of revision with posterior decompression and fusion. This carries significant morbidity and can be technically difficult. An alternative is stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), which may avoid complications associated with revision surgery. We describe the largest cohort of patients treated with LLIF for ASD to our knowledge. -METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on all patients who underwent transpsoas LLIF for ASD at a single academic center between 2012 and 2019. Post-operative improvement was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). -RESULTS: Forty-four patients who underwent LLIF for ASD were identified. Median age was 65 years. Median time from index surgery to ASD development was 78 months. Median levels fused via LLIF was 1. Our median follow-up was 358 days. At follow-up, the median VAS back pain score was 0 (mean, 0.884), median VAS leg pain score was 1 (mean, 0.953), and median ODI was 8. The median improvement for VAS back pain was 8, for VAS leg pain was 6, and for ODI was 40. No patients suffered new neurologic symptoms postoperatively. Of the 17 patients who initially presented with non-pain neurologic symp-toms, 8 (47.1%) experienced complete resolution of symp-toms, and 5 (29.4%) experienced only some improvement. -CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort study of patients to date evaluating stand-alone LLIF for ASD. Our patient outcomes show it is safe and effective with low risk of morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:E225 / E230
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion superior to instrumented lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-level, low-grade, lumbar spondylolisthesis?
    Li, Hao
    Li, Jun
    Tao, Yiqing
    Li, Fangcai
    Chen, Qixin
    Chen, Gang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 85 : 84 - 91
  • [22] Evaluating Outcomes of Stand-Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
    Giang, Gloria
    Mobbs, Ralph
    Phan, Steven
    Tran, Tommy Manh
    Phan, Kevin
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 104 : 259 - 271
  • [23] Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Supplemental Posterior Instrumentation in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Zhou, XiaoCheng
    Zhou, Qiujun
    Jin, Xiaoliang
    Zhang, Jinjie
    Song, Zhoufeng
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 15 (02) : 1375 - 1389
  • [24] The effect of sarcopenia in the clinical outcomes following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Li, Hao
    Li, Jun
    Ma, Yaojing
    Li, Fangcai
    Xu, Zhengkuan
    Chen, Qixin
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 34 (03) : 469 - 476
  • [25] Stand-alone minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Multicenter clinical outcomes
    Ahmadian, Arnir
    Bach, Konrad
    Bolinger, Bryan
    Malham, Gregory M.
    Okonkwo, David O.
    Kanter, Adam S.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (04) : 740 - 746
  • [26] Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion using a stand-alone construct for the treatment of adjacent segment disease of the lumbar spine: Review of the literature and report of three cases
    Palejwala, Sheri K.
    Sheen, Whitney A.
    Walter, Christina M.
    Dunn, Jack H.
    Baaj, Ali A.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 124 : 90 - 105
  • [27] Incidence and impact of implant subsidence after stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Bocahut, N.
    Audureau, E.
    Poignard, A.
    Delambre, J.
    Queinnecc, S.
    Lachaniette, C. -H. Flouzat
    Allain, J.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2018, 104 (03) : 405 - 410
  • [28] Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Yee, Timothy J.
    Terman, Samuel W.
    La Marca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (10) : 1796 - 1801
  • [29] Comparison of Stand-Alone, Transpsoas Lateral Interbody Fusion at L3-4 and Cranial vs Transforaminal Interbody Fusion at L3-4 and L4-5 for the Treatment of Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease
    Jain, Deeptee
    Verma, Kushagra
    Mulvihill, Jeffrey
    Mizutani, Jun
    Tay, Bobby
    Burch, Shane
    Deviren, Vedat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 12 (04): : 469 - 474
  • [30] Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Efficacy of Simultaneous Decompression Surgery for Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease
    Hikata, Tomohiro
    Kamata, Michihiro
    Furukawa, Mitsuru
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2014, 27 (02): : 70 - 75