Effects of surface wettability on gecko adhesion underwater

被引:19
|
作者
Peng, Z. L. [1 ]
Wang, C. [1 ]
Chen, S. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mech, LNM, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
关键词
Gecko; Adhesion; Surface wettability; Nano-bubble; Capillary force; HYDROPHOBIC SURFACES; FRICTIONAL ADHESION; CAPILLARY FORCE; CONTACT; WATER; NANOBUBBLES; ATTACHMENT; MECHANICS; BUBBLES; MICRO;
D O I
10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.07.047
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Recent experiments have shown that gecko adhesion underwater depends significantly on surface wettability. Theoretical models of a gecko seta adhering on different substrates are firstly established in order to disclose such an adhesion mechanism. The results show that the capillary force induced by nano-bubbles between gecko seta and the substrate is the mainly influencing factor. The capillary force exhibits an attractive feature between gecko setae and hydrophobic surfaces underwater. However, it is extremely weak or even repulsive on hydrophilic surfaces underwater. A self-similarly splitting model is further considered to simulate multiple gecko setae on substrates underwater. It is interesting to find that the total capillary force depends significantly on the number of nano-bubble bridges and wettability of substrates. The total force is attractive and increases monotonically with the increase of the splitting number on hydrophobic substrates underwater. However, it decreases drastically or even becomes repulsive on hydrophilic substrates underwater. The present result can not only give a reasonable explanation on the existing experimental observations but also be helpful for the design of novel biomimetic adhesives. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 668
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surface wettability plays a significant role in gecko adhesion underwater
    Stark, Alyssa Y.
    Badge, Ila
    Wucinich, Nicholas A.
    Sullivan, Timothy W.
    Niewiarowski, Peter H.
    Dhinojwala, Ali
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (16) : 6340 - 6345
  • [2] Reduction of Water Surface Tension Significantly Impacts Gecko Adhesion Underwater
    Stark, Alyssa Y.
    McClung, Brandon
    Niewiarowski, Peter H.
    Dhinojwala, Ali
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 54 (06) : 1026 - 1033
  • [3] Effects of surface ageing on wettability, surface chemistry, and adhesion of wood
    Gindl, M
    Reiterer, A
    Sinn, G
    Stanzl-Tschegg, SE
    HOLZ ALS ROH-UND WERKSTOFF, 2004, 62 (04) : 273 - 280
  • [4] Strategies to modulate underwater oil wettability and adhesion
    Borbora, Angana
    Manna, Uttam
    ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2025, 340
  • [5] Influence of surface roughness on gecko adhesion
    Huber, Gerrit
    Gorb, Stanislav N.
    Hosoda, Naoe
    Spolenak, Ralph
    Arzt, Eduard
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2007, 3 (04) : 607 - 610
  • [6] Gecko adhesion pad: a smart surface?
    Pesika, Noshir S.
    Zeng, Hongbo
    Kristiansen, Kai
    Zhao, Boxin
    Tian, Yu
    Autumn, Kellar
    Israelachvili, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER, 2009, 21 (46)
  • [7] The effect of substrate wettability and modulus on gecko and gecko-inspired synthetic adhesion in variable temperature and humidity
    Christopher T. Mitchell
    Cem Balda Dayan
    Dirk-M. Drotlef
    Metin Sitti
    Alyssa Y. Stark
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [8] The effect of substrate wettability and modulus on gecko and gecko-inspired synthetic adhesion in variable temperature and humidity
    Mitchell, Christopher T.
    Dayan, Cem Balda
    Drotlef, Dirk-M
    Sitti, Metin
    Stark, Alyssa Y.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [9] The Effect of Surface Water and Wetting on Gecko Adhesion
    Stark, A. Y.
    Sullivan, T. W.
    Niewiarowski, P. H.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2012, 52 : E333 - E333
  • [10] The effect of surface water and wetting on gecko adhesion
    Stark, Alyssa Y.
    Sullivan, Timothy W.
    Niewiarowski, Peter H.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 215 (17): : 3080 - 3086