Market knowledge as a driver of sustainable use of common-pool resources: A lab-in-the-field study among pastoralists in Ethiopia

被引:5
作者
Gugissa, Desalegn A. [1 ]
Ingenbleek, Paul T. M. [2 ]
van Trijp, Hans C. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kotebe Metropolitan Univ, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[2] Wageningen Univ, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Market knowledge; Market integration; Sustainability; Common-pool resources; Rural communities; INSTITUTIONS; INFORMATION; COMMUNICATION; COOPERATION; INTEGRATION; MANAGEMENT; TRAGEDY; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107039
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Rural communities that depend on common-pool resources for their livelihoods are being increasingly affected by the expanding global market system. Because such market integration is still relatively thin, communities vary in terms of market comprehension. Using a common-pool resource dilemma experiment, this study examines the effect of market knowledge on decisions concerning the use of common-pool resources among Borana pastoralists. Participants chose to use shared grazing rangelands at low or high levels of grazing intensity. Depending on the resource-use decisions in previous rounds, the participants encountered different pasture-availability conditions that required them to make trade-offs between their short-term interests and the long-term sustainability of the shared rangelands. The results indicate that, when resource conditions were good, resource users with more market knowledge are more likely to choose lower grazing intensity. During scarcity, this effect is weaker. The results further show that within-group variance in market knowledge has a negative effect on decisions relating to sustainable-resource use in times of resource scarcity. The results imply that providing an understanding of market functioning is of vital importance to protecting shared natural resources from depletion in communities experiencing increasing impact from the global market economy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Institutional failure in resource management [J].
Acheson, James M. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOLOGY, 2006, 35 :117-134
[2]   How do local institutions mediate market and population pressures on resources? Forest Panchayats in Kumaon, India [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Yadama, GN .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 1997, 28 (03) :435-465
[3]   Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources [J].
Agrawal, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1649-1672
[4]   The challenge of understanding decisions in experimental studies of common pool resource governance [J].
Anderies, John M. ;
Janssen, Marco A. ;
Bousquet, Francois ;
Cardenas, Juan-Camilo ;
Castillo, Daniel ;
Lopez, Maria-Claudio ;
Tobias, Robert ;
Vollan, Bjoern ;
Wutich, Amber .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (09) :1571-1579
[5]   Inequalities, institutions, and forest commons [J].
Andersson, Krister ;
Agrawal, Arun .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2011, 21 (03) :866-875
[6]   A Behavioral Theory of the Firm -: 40 years and counting:: Introduction and impact [J].
Argote, Linda ;
Greve, Henrich R. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (03) :337-349
[7]  
Basurto X, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
[8]   The Effects of Communication on the Partnership Solution to the Commons [J].
Buckley, Neil J. ;
Mestelman, Stuart ;
Muller, R. Andrew ;
Schott, Stephan ;
Zhang, Jingjing .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2018, 70 (02) :363-380
[9]   What do people bring into the game?: Experiments in the field about cooperation in the commons [J].
Cárdenas, JC ;
Ostrom, E .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2004, 82 (03) :307-326
[10]  
Cardenas JC, 2013, HANDBOOK ON EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, P319