Sacral neuromodulation for refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction: Results of a nationwide registry in Switzerland

被引:72
作者
Kessler, Thomas M. [1 ]
Buchser, Eric
Meyer, Sylvain
Engeler, Daniel S.
Al-Khodairy, Abdul-Wahab
Bersch, Ulf
Iselin, Christophe E.
Roche, Bruno
Schmid, Daniel M.
Schurch, Brigitte
Zrehen, Stephane
Burkhard, Fiona C.
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Dept Urol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Reg Hosp Morges, Div Anesthesiol, Morges, Switzerland
[3] Reg Hosp Morges, Div Obstet & Gynecol, Morges, Switzerland
[4] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, Dept Urol, St Gallen, Switzerland
[5] Rehabil Clin SuvaCare, Spinal Cord Unit, Sion, Switzerland
[6] Swiss Parapleg Ctr, Nottwil, Switzerland
[7] Univ Geneva, Dept Urol, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
[8] Univ Geneva, Dept Visceral Surg, Proctol Unit, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
[9] Univ Zurich, Dept Urol, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[10] Univ Zurich, Spinal Cord Injury Ctr, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[11] Medtron Europe, Tolonchenaz, Switzerland
关键词
sacral neuromodulation; lower urinary tract dysfunction; Swiss Registry;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in patients with refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction in Switzerland based on a nationwide registry. Patients and methods: A total of 209 patients (181 females, 28 males) underwent SNM testing between July 2000 and December 2005 in Switzerland. Subjective symptom improvement, bladder/pain diary variables, adverse events, and their management were prospectively registered. Results: SNM testing was successful (defined as improvement of more than 50% in bladder/pain diary variables) in 102 of 209 patients (49%). An implantable pulse generator (IPG) was placed in 91 patients (89% of all successfully tested and 44% of all tested patients). Of the IPG-implanted patients, 71 had urge incontinence, 13 nonobstructive chronic urinary retention, and 7 chronic pelvic pain syndrome. After a median follow-up of 24 mo, SNM was successful in 64 of the 91 IPG-implanted patients (70%) but failed in 27 patients. SNM was continued in 15 of the 27 patients considered failures, because following troubleshooting SNM response improved subjectively and the patients were satisfied. However, improvement in bladder/pain diary variables remained less than 50%. In the other 12 patients both the leads and the IPG were explanted. During the test phase and during/following IPG implantation, 6% (12 of 209) and 11% (10 of 91) adverse event rates and 1% (3 of 209) and 7% (6 of 91) surgical revision rates were reported, respectively. Conclusions: SNM is an effective and safe treatment for refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction. Adverse events are usually transient and can be treated effectively. (c) 2006 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1357 / 1363
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Surgical techniques of sacral implantation
    Chai, TC
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 32 (01) : 27 - +
  • [2] Sacral neuromodulation for the symptomatic treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis: A prospective study
    Comiter, CV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04) : 1369 - 1373
  • [3] A prospective randomized trial comparing the 1-stage with the 2-stage implantation of a pulse generator in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction selected for sacral nerve stimulation
    Everaert, K
    Kerckhaert, W
    Caluwaerts, H
    Audenaert, M
    Vereecke, H
    De Cuypere, G
    Boelaert, A
    Van den Hombergh, U
    Oosterlinck, W
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 45 (05) : 649 - 654
  • [4] GRUNEWALD V, 2002, NEW PERSPECTIVES SAC, P117
  • [5] Sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of urgency-frequency symptoms: A multicenter study on efficacy and safety
    Hassouna, MM
    Siegel, SW
    Nyeholt, AABLA
    Elhilali, MM
    van Kerrebroeck, PEV
    Das, AK
    Gajewski, JB
    Janknegt, RA
    Rivas, DA
    Dijkema, H
    Milam, DF
    Oleson, KA
    Schmidt, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (06) : 1849 - 1854
  • [6] Improving neuromodulation technique for refractory voiding dysfunctions: Two-stage implant
    Janknegt, RA
    Weil, EHJ
    Eerdmans, PHA
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1997, 49 (03) : 358 - 362
  • [7] Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention:: Results 18 months after implantation
    Jonas, U
    Fowler, CJ
    Chancellor, MB
    Elhilali, MM
    Fall, M
    Gajewski, JB
    Grünewald, V
    Hassouna, MM
    vander Hombergh, U
    Janknegt, R
    van Kerrebroeck, PEV
    Nijeholt, AABLA
    Siegel, SW
    Schmidt, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [8] Prolonged sacral neuromodulation testing using permanent leads: A more reliable patient selection method?
    Kessler, TM
    Madersbacher, H
    Kiss, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 47 (05) : 660 - 665
  • [9] Patient satisfaction with the outcome of surgery for urethral stricture
    Kessler, TM
    Fisch, M
    Heitz, M
    Olianas, R
    Schreiter, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (06) : 2507 - 2511
  • [10] Neurophysiological evidence may predict the outcome of sacral neuromodulation
    Malaguti, S
    Spinelli, M
    Giardiello, G
    Lazzeri, M
    Van den Hombergh, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) : 2323 - 2326