Can energy commodities affect energy blockchain-based cryptos?

被引:15
作者
Gurrib, Ikhlaas [1 ]
机构
[1] Canadian Univ Dubai, Sch Grad Studies, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Structural break; VAR; Impulse response; Energy commodity; Energy crypto currencies; Q02; Q41; Q42; Q47; CURRENCY; BITCOIN;
D O I
10.1108/SEF-10-2018-0313
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to shed fresh light into whether an energy commodity price index (ENFX) and energy blockchain-based crypto price index (ENCX) can be used to predict movements in the energy commodity and energy crypto market. Design/methodology/approach Using principal component analysis over daily data of crude oil, heating oil, natural gas and energy based cryptos, the ENFX and ENCX indices are constructed, where ENFX (ENCX) represents 94% (88%) of variability in energy commodity (energy crypto) prices. Findings Natural gas price movements were better explained by ENCX, and shared positive (negative) correlations with cryptos (crude oil and heating oil). Using a vector autoregressive model (VAR), while the 1-day lagged ENCX (ENFX) was significant in estimating current ENCX (ENFX) values, only lagged ENCX was significant in estimating current ENFX. Granger causality tests confirmed the two markets do not granger cause each other. One standard deviation shock in ENFX had a negative effect on ENCX. Weak forecasting results of the VAR model, support the two markets are not robust forecasters of each other. Robustness wise, the VAR model ranked lower than an autoregressive model, but higher than a random walk model. Research limitations/implications - Significant structural breaks at distinct dates in the two markets reinforce that the two markets do not help to predict each other. The findings are limited by the existence of bubbles (December 2017-January 2018) which were witnessed in energy blockchain-based crypto markets and natural gas, but not in crude oil and heating oil. Originality/value As per the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper to analyze the relationship between leading energy commodities and energy blockchain-based crypto markets.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / 699
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Alexandre A., 2018, WALMART AWARDED PATE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, DOI DOI 10.20955/R.63.2-17.ZWT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, PARADIGM, DOI DOI 10.1177/0971890717700529
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, World Energy Outlook 2017, DOI DOI 10.1787/WEO-2017-EN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ARE CRUDE OIL NATURA
[6]  
Burger C., 2016, BLOCK CHAIN ENERGY T
[7]   PRICE AND EXCHANGE-RATE DETERMINATION DURING THE GREENBACK SUSPENSION [J].
CALOMIRIS, CW .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1988, 40 (04) :719-750
[8]   Financial stress and economic contractions [J].
Cardarelli, Roberto ;
Elekdag, Selim ;
Lall, Subir .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2011, 7 (02) :78-97
[9]  
Chen H., 2018, G7 COUNTRIES WASTE 1
[10]   Crypto-currency bubbles: an application of the Phillips-Shi-Yu (2013) methodology on Mt. Gox bitcoin prices [J].
Cheung, Adrian ;
Roca, Eduardo ;
Su, Jen-Je .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2015, 47 (23) :2348-2358