Effects of hearing aid amplification and stimulus intensity on cortical auditory evoked Potentials

被引:63
作者
Billings, Curtis J.
Tremblay, Kelly L.
Souza, Pamela E.
Binns, Malcolm A.
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] Rotman Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
cortical auditory evoked potentials; event-related potentials; hearing aids; P1-N1-P2; complex; stimulus intensity; BROAD-BAND NOISE; NEURAL REPRESENTATION; AMPLIFIED SPEECH; RESPONSES; AMPLITUDE; TONES; SOUND; PERCEPTION; MASKING; LATENCY;
D O I
10.1159/000101331
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Hearing aid amplification can be used as a model for studying the effects of auditory stimulation on the central auditory system (CAS). We examined the effects of stimulus presentation level on the physiological detection of sound in unaided and aided conditions. P1, N1, P2, and N2 cortical evoked potentials were recorded in sound field from 13 normal-hearing young adults in response to a 1000-Hz tone presented at seven stimulus intensity levels. As expected, peak amplitudes increased and peak latencies decreased with increasing intensity for unaided and aided conditions. However, there was no significant effect of amplification on latencies or amplitudes. Taken together, these results demonstrate that 20 dB of hearing aid gain affects neural responses differently than 20 dB of stimulus intensity change. Hearing aid signal processing is discussed as a possible contributor to these results. This study demonstrates (1) the importance of controlling for stimulus intensity when evoking responses in aided conditions, and (2) the need to better understand the interaction between the hearing aid and the CAS. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 246
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
ADLER G, 1989, AUDIOLOGY, V28, P316
[2]   AUDITORY STIMULUS-PROCESSING AT DIFFERENT STIMULUS INTENSITIES AS REFLECTED BY AUDITORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS [J].
ADLER, G ;
ADLER, J .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1991, 29 (04) :347-356
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, ASHA, V32, P17
[4]  
Beagley H A, 1967, J Laryngol Otol, V81, P861, DOI 10.1017/S0022215100067815
[5]   COMPARISON BETWEEN GROWTH OF AVERAGED ELECTROENCEPHALIC RESPONSE AND DIRECT LOUDNESS ESTIMATIONS [J].
BOTTE, MC ;
BUJAS, Z ;
CHOCHOLLE, R .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1975, 58 (01) :208-213
[6]   FRONTAL AUDITORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS AND AUGMENTING-REDUCING [J].
BRUNEAU, N ;
ROUX, S ;
GARREAU, B ;
LELORD, G .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (05) :364-371
[7]   THE EFFECT OF BROAD-BAND NOISE ON THE HUMAN BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY EVOKED-RESPONSE .1. RATE AND INTENSITY EFFECTS [J].
BURKARD, R ;
HECOX, K .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1983, 74 (04) :1204-1213
[8]   AN INVESTIGATION OF HUMAN CORTICAL EVOKED POTENTIAL UNDER CONDITIONS OF MONAURAL AND BINAURAL STIMULATION [J].
BUTLER, RA ;
KEIDEL, WD ;
SPRENG, M .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1969, 68 (04) :317-&
[9]  
Caldwell Marc, 2006, Trends Amplif, V10, P145, DOI 10.1177/1084713806292653
[10]  
Cohen Jacob, 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203771587