Assessing the aesthetic quality of landscapes in Germany

被引:113
作者
Hermes, Johannes [1 ]
Albert, Christian [1 ]
von Haaren, Christina [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Environm Planning, Herrenhauser Str 2, D-30419 Hannover, Germany
关键词
CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; INDICATORS; PREFERENCES; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT; RECREATION; COMPLEXITY; SUPPORT; TOURISM; METRICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.015
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A high landscape aesthetic quality (LAQ) arguably is an important ecosystem service that positively affects humans' health and well-being. It is strongly appreciated by citizens and provides the backdrop and precondition for many outdoor activities. The objective of this paper is to map and assess the LAQ of landscapes across Germany. We developed and tested a method for a spatially explicit national assessment of LAQ. The method uses landscape diversity, naturalness and uniqueness as established indicators for landscape attractiveness, and applies several landscape metrics as proxies to spatially evaluate and map each of them. The results demonstrate that the LAQ varies substantially across Germany. Areas of high LAQ are located in the German high and many low mountain ranges, in riverine landscapes, and at the German coast and islands, whereas particularly low LAQ scores are found in urban agglomerations and intensively used open agrarian landscapes. The proportional distribution of values shows that most area is covered with mediocre scores, and that areas of extremely high or low scores are rare. The results respond to the EU biodiversity strategy's request to member states to map and assess ecosystem services, and can usefully inform national and sub-national policy-, plan-, and decision-making. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 307
页数:12
相关论文
共 88 条
[61]   Trialling a method to quantify the 'cultural services' of the English landscape using Countryside Survey data [J].
Norton, L. R. ;
Inwood, H. ;
Crowe, A. ;
Baker, A. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2012, 29 (02) :449-455
[62]   Analysing the relationship between indicators of landscape complexity and preference [J].
Ode, Asa ;
Miller, David .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2011, 38 (01) :24-40
[63]   Analysing Visual Landscape Complexity: Theory and Application [J].
Ode, Asa ;
Hagerhall, Caroline M. ;
Sang, Neil .
LANDSCAPE RESEARCH, 2010, 35 (01) :111-131
[64]   Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference [J].
Ode, Asa ;
Fry, Gary ;
Tveit, Mari S. ;
Messager, Pernette ;
Miller, David .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (01) :375-383
[65]   Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: Touching base with landscape aesthetic theory [J].
Ode, Ase ;
Tveit, Mari S. ;
Fry, Gary .
LANDSCAPE RESEARCH, 2008, 33 (01) :89-117
[66]   Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts [J].
Palmer, JF .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2004, 69 (2-3) :201-218
[67]   Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU [J].
Paracchini, Maria Luisa ;
Zulian, Grazia ;
Kopperoinen, Leena ;
Maes, Joachim ;
Schaegner, Jan Philipp ;
Termansen, Mette ;
Zandersen, Marianne ;
Perez-Soba, Marta ;
Scholefield, Paul A. ;
Bidoglio, Giovanni .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 45 :371-385
[68]   Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach [J].
Pena, Lorena ;
Casado-Arzuaga, Izaskun ;
Onaindia, Miren .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 13 :108-118
[69]   Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level [J].
Plieninger, Tobias ;
Dijks, Sebastian ;
Oteros-Rozas, Elisa ;
Bieling, Claudia .
LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 33 :118-129
[70]  
Reuter U., 2013, STADTEBAULICHE LARMF, P167