Care Ethics, Bruno Latour, and the Anthropocene

被引:14
作者
Flower, Michael [1 ]
Hamington, Maurice [2 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Univ Studies, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Portland State Univ, Dept Philosophy, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
actor-network theory; Anthropocene; Bruno Latour; care ethics; hesitation; Gaia; hiatus; modes of existence; relationality; translation;
D O I
10.3390/philosophies7020031
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Bruno Latour is one of the founding figures in social network theory and a broadly influential systems thinker. Although his work has always been relational, little scholarship has engaged the relational morality, ontology, and epistemology of feminist care ethics with Latour's actor-network theory. This article is intended as a translation and a prompt to spur further interactions. Latour's recent publications, in particular, have focused on the new climate regime of the Anthropocene. Care theorists are just beginning to address posthuman approaches to care. The argument here is that Latourian analysis is helpful for such explorations, given that caring for the earth and its inhabitants is the dire moral challenge of our time. The aim here is not to characterize Latour as a care theorist but rather as a provocative scholar who has much to say that is significant to care thinking. We begin with a brief introduction to Latour's scholarship and lexicon, followed by a discussion of care theorist Puig de la Bellacasa's work on Latour. We then explore recent work on care and the environment consistent with a Latourian approach. The conclusion reinforces the notion that valuing relationality across humans and non-human matter is essential to confronting the Anthropocene.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   TOWARD A FEMINIST CARE ETHIC FOR CLIMATE CHANGE [J].
Allison, Elizabeth .
JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION, 2017, 33 (02) :152-158
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CARE UNCERTAINTY INT
[3]  
de la Bellacasa MariaPuig., 2017, MATTERS CARE SPECULA, V41
[4]  
Dionne E., 2021, Care Ethics in the Age of Precarity, P229
[5]   Post-Humanism, Transhumanism, Anti-Humanism, Meta-Humanism and new materialisms Differences and Relations [J].
Ferrando, Francesca .
REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA AURORA, 2019, 31 (54) :958-971
[6]  
Hamington M., 2021, Care ethics in the age of precarity
[7]  
Hamington M., 2001, EMBODIED CARE JANE A
[8]  
Haraway DJ., 2016, STAYING TROUBLE MAKI, DOI [10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q, DOI 10.2307/J.CTV11CW25Q]
[9]   Demodernizing the Humanities with Latour [J].
Harman, Graham .
NEW LITERARY HISTORY, 2016, 47 (2-3) :249-274
[10]  
Johns-Putra A, 2013, SYMPLOKE, V21, P125