A Cloud Detection Method for Landsat 8 Images Based on PCANet

被引:78
作者
Zi, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Fengying [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Zhiguo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Astronaut, Image Proc Ctr, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Beijing Key Lab Digital Media, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cloud detection; multispectral remote sensing; superpixel; PCA network; conditional random field; SHADOW DETECTION; AUTOMATED CLOUD; DETECTION ALGORITHM; SNOW DETECTION; CLASSIFICATION; CONTAMINATION; TRANSFORM; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.3390/rs10060877
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Cloud detection for remote sensing images is often a necessary process, because cloud is widespread in optical remote sensing images and causes a lot of difficulty to many remote sensing activities, such as land cover monitoring, environmental monitoring and target recognizing. In this paper, a novel cloud detection method is proposed for multispectral remote sensing images from Landsat 8. Firstly, the color composite image of Bands 6, 3 and 2 is divided into superpixel sub-regions through Simple Linear Iterative Cluster (SLIC) method. Then, a two-step superpixel classification strategy is used to predict each superpixel as cloud or non-cloud. Thirdly, a fully connected Conditional Random Field (CRF) model is used to refine the cloud detection result, and accurate cloud borders are obtained. In the two-step superpixel classification strategy, the bright and thick cloud superpixels, as well as the obvious non-cloud superpixels, are firstly separated from potential cloud superpixels through a threshold function, which greatly speeds up the detection. The designed double-branch PCA Network (PCANet) architecture can extract the high-level information of cloud, then combined with a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier, the potential superpixels are correctly classified. Visual and quantitative comparison experiments are conducted on the Landsat 8 Cloud Cover Assessment (L8 CCA) dataset; the results indicate that our proposed method can accurately detect clouds under different conditions, which is more effective and robust than the compared state-of-the-art methods.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   SLIC Superpixels Compared to State-of-the-Art Superpixel Methods [J].
Achanta, Radhakrishna ;
Shaji, Appu ;
Smith, Kevin ;
Lucchi, Aurelien ;
Fua, Pascal ;
Suesstrunk, Sabine .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2012, 34 (11) :2274-2281
[2]   Scene Learning for Cloud Detection on Remote-Sensing Images [J].
An, Zhenyu ;
Shi, Zhenwei .
IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 8 (08) :4206-4222
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, P ADV NEUR INF PROC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ADV NEURAL INF PROCE
[5]   Cloud Detection for High-Resolution Satellite Imagery Using Machine Learning and Multi-Feature Fusion [J].
Bai, Ting ;
Li, Deren ;
Sun, Kaimin ;
Chen, Yepei ;
Li, Wenzhuo .
REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (09)
[6]   PCANet: A Simple Deep Learning Baseline for Image Classification? [J].
Chan, Tsung-Han ;
Jia, Kui ;
Gao, Shenghua ;
Lu, Jiwen ;
Zeng, Zinan ;
Ma, Yi .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2015, 24 (12) :5017-5032
[7]   DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs [J].
Chen, Liang-Chieh ;
Papandreou, George ;
Kokkinos, Iasonas ;
Murphy, Kevin ;
Yuille, Alan L. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 40 (04) :834-848
[8]   Quantitative evaluation of observation capability of GF-1 wide field of view sensors for soil moisture inversion [J].
Chen, Nengcheng ;
Li, Jizhen ;
Zhang, Xiang .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 9
[9]   An Iterative Haze Optimized Transformation for Automatic Cloud/Haze Detection of Landsat Imagery [J].
Chen, Shuli ;
Chen, Xuehong ;
Chen, Jin ;
Jia, Pengfei ;
Cao, Xin ;
Liu, Canyou .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 54 (05) :2682-2694
[10]   DETECTION AND REMOVAL OF CLOUD CONTAMINATION FROM AVHRR IMAGES [J].
CIHLAR, J ;
HOWARTH, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1994, 32 (03) :583-589