Building protest online: engagement with the digitally networked #not1more protest campaign on Twitter

被引:30
作者
van Haperen, Sander [1 ]
Nicholls, Walter [2 ]
Uitermark, Justus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Social Sci Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urban Planning Policy & Design, Irvine, CA USA
关键词
Networks; social movements; social media; Twitter; immigration; geography; SOCIAL-MOVEMENTS; MEDIA; DYNAMICS; DIFFUSION; SPACE;
D O I
10.1080/14742837.2018.1434499
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article examines engagement with digitally networked, politically contentious actions. Maintaining engagement over time is a key challenge for social movements attempting to network digitally. This article argues that proximity serves as a condition to address this challenge, because it configures the personal networks upon which transmission depends. This is a paradox of digital activism: it has the capacity to transcend barriers; however, proximity is essential for sustaining relations over time. Examining Twitter data from the #not1more protest campaign against immigrant deportations in the United States, quantitative and social network analyses show a differentiated development of engagement, which results in a particular geographical configuration with the following attributes. First, there is a robust and connected backbone of core organizers and activists located in particular major cities. Second, local groups engage with the campaign with direct actions in other cities. Third, a large and transitory contingent of geographically dispersed users direct attention to the campaign. We conclude by elaborating how this geographically differentiated configuration helps to sustain engagement with digitally networked action.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 423
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] The dynamics of protest diffusion: Movement organizations, social networks, and news media in the 1960 sit-ins
    Andrews, Kenneth T.
    Biggs, Michael
    [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 71 (05) : 752 - 777
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  • [3] Dynamics of political polarization
    Baldassarri, Delia
    Bearman, Peter
    [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 72 (05) : 784 - 811
  • [4] Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment
    Benford, RD
    Snow, DA
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 26 : 611 - 639
  • [5] THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics
    Bennett, W. Lance
    Segerberg, Alexandra
    [J]. INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2012, 15 (05) : 739 - 768
  • [6] Borge-Holthoefer J., 2014, SPANISH INDIGNADOS M, P155, DOI [10.1007/978-3-7091-1340-0_9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-7091-1340-0_9]
  • [7] Borge-holthoefer J., 2015, P 18 C COMP SUPP COO, P739
  • [8] Structural and Dynamical Patterns on Online Social Networks: The Spanish May 15th Movement as a Case Study
    Borge-Holthoefer, Javier
    Rivero, Alejandro
    Garcia, Inigo
    Cauhe, Elisa
    Ferrer, Alfredo
    Ferrer, Dario
    Francos, David
    Iniguez, David
    Pilar Perez, Maria
    Ruiz, Gonzalo
    Sanz, Francisco
    Serrano, Fermin
    Vinas, Cristina
    Tarancon, Alfonso
    Moreno, Yamir
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (08):
  • [9] The Social Origins of Networks and Diffusion
    Centola, Damon
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2015, 120 (05) : 1295 - 1338
  • [10] Globalization and transnational diffusion between social movements: Reconceptualizing the dissemination of the Gandhian repertoire and the "coming out" routine
    Chabot, S
    Duyvendak, JW
    [J]. THEORY AND SOCIETY, 2002, 31 (06) : 697 - 740