THE TECHNOLOGY, BUILDING AND DWELLING IN MARTIN HEIDEGGER AND JOSE ORTEGA Y GASSET

被引:0
作者
Blecha, Ivan [1 ]
机构
[1] Filozoficka Fak UP, Katedra Filozofie, Krizkovskeho 12, Olomouc 77180, Czech Republic
来源
FILOZOFIA | 2017年 / 72卷 / 05期
关键词
Heidegger; Ortega y Gasset; Metaphysics; Technology; Building; Architecture; Existence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The article offers a comparison of two entirely contrapositive conceptions of technology: those of Martin Heidegger and Jose Ortega y Gasset. While Heidegger conceives of technology as one of the effects of metaphysical, i.e. failing thinking of being and world, Ortega y Gasset sees the technology as a means which enables the person to set himself/herself free from his/her animal nature and create a space appropriate for actual human needs. Resulting from these opposite stands are the opposite views on the relationship between dwelling"and building". According to Heidegger, we first have to master the art of dwelling; only then we can start building. According to Ortega y Gasset, we first need the technological building dispositions; the need to dwell appears afterwards. However, it is the concept of architecture which shows the limits in both thinkers. A more balanced attitude is represented by Karsten Harries in his book The Ethical Function of Architecture. Namely, it takes into account the free space as a place for encounters with other people. Thus the conception of dwelling, building and technology in general takes on a social dimension, which is apparently missing in Heidegger.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 346
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, M HEIDEGGERS PHANOME
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, VORTRAGE AUFSATZE
[3]  
CAPEK K., 1970, MISTO PROJONATHANA
[4]  
GEHLEN A, 1972, DUCH SVETE TECHNIKY
[5]  
GIEDION S., 1965, RAUM Z ARCHITEKTUR E
[6]  
HARRIES Karsten., 2011, Eticka funkce architektury
[7]  
HEIDEGGER M., 1983, ERFAHRUNG DENKENS 19, V7
[8]  
HEIDEGGER M., 2006, BASNICLRY BYDLI NOVA
[9]  
HEIDEGGER M, 1996, Byti a cas
[10]  
HEIDEGGER M., 2006, KONEC FILOSOFIE IIKO