Using performance reference compounds to compare mass transfer calibration methodologies in passive samplers deployed in the water column

被引:16
作者
Joyce, Abigail S. [1 ]
Burgess, Robert M. [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Atlantic Ecol Div, Natl Hlth & Environm Effects Res Lab, Off Res & Dev, Narragansett, RI 02882 USA
关键词
Passive sampling; Polychlorinated biphenyls; Persistent organic pollutants; Performance reference compounds; HYDROPHOBIC ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS; SEMIPERMEABLE-MEMBRANE DEVICES; SHELF SUPERFUND SITE; SAMPLING METHODS; DISSOLVED CONCENTRATIONS; PORE-WATER; SEDIMENTS; COEFFICIENTS; ENVIRONMENT; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1002/etc.4167
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Performance reference compounds (PRCs) are often added to passive samplers prior to field deployments to provide information about mass transfer kinetics between the sampled environment and the passive sampler. Their popularity has resulted in different methods of varying complexity to estimate mass transfer and better estimate freely dissolved concentrations (C-free) of targeted compounds. Three methods for describing a mass transfer model are commonly used: a first-order kinetic method, a nonlinear least squares fitting of sampling rate, and a diffusion method. Low-density polyethylene strips loaded with PRCs and of 4 different thicknesses were used as passive samplers to create an array of PRC results to assess the comparability and reproducibility of each of the methods. Samplers were deployed in the water column at 3 stations in New Bedford Harbor (MA, USA). Collected data allowed C-free comparisons to be performed in 2 ways: 1) comparison of C-free derived from one thickness using different methods, and 2) comparison of C-free derived by the same method using different thicknesses of polyethylene. Overall, the nonlinear least squares and diffusion methods demonstrated the most precise results for all the PCBs measured and generated C-free values that were often statistically indistinguishable. Relative standard deviations (RSDs) for total PCB measurements using the same thickness and varying model types ranged from 0.04 to 12% and increased with sampler thickness, and RSDs for estimates using the same method and varying thickness ranged from 8 to 18%. Environmental scientists and managers are encouraged to use these methods when estimating C-free from passive sampling and PRC data. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:2089-2097. Published 2018 Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of SETAC. This article is a US government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.
引用
收藏
页码:2089 / 2097
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] In situ passive sampling of sediments in the Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund site: Replicability, comparison with ex situ measurements, and use of data
    Apell, Jennifer N.
    Gschwend, Philip M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2016, 218 : 95 - 101
  • [2] Understanding the rates of nonpolar organic chemical accumulation into passive samplers deployed in the environment: Guidance for passive sampler deployments
    Apell, Jennifer N.
    Tcaciuc, A. Patricia
    Gschwend, Philip M.
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 12 (03) : 486 - 492
  • [3] Validating the Use of Performance Reference Compounds in Passive Samplers to Assess Porewater Concentrations in Sediment Beds
    Apell, Jennifer N.
    Gschwend, Philip M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (17) : 10301 - 10307
  • [4] Thickness and material selection of polymeric passive samplers for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water: Which more strongly affects sampler properties?
    Belles, Angel
    Alary, Claire
    Mamindy-Pajany, Yannick
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2016, 35 (07) : 1708 - 1717
  • [5] Passive Sampling in Regulatory Chemical Monitoring of Nonpolar Organic Compounds in the Aquatic Environment
    Booij, Kees
    Robinson, Craig D.
    Burgess, Robert M.
    Mayer, Philipp
    Roberts, Cindy A.
    Ahrens, Lutz
    Allan, Ian J.
    Brant, Jan
    Jones, Lisa
    Kraus, Uta R.
    Larsen, Martin M.
    Lepom, Peter
    Petersen, Joerdis
    Proefrock, Daniel
    Roose, Patrick
    Schaefer, Sabine
    Smedes, Foppe
    Tixier, Celine
    Vorkamp, Katrin
    Whitehouse, Paul
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (01) : 3 - 17
  • [6] An Improved Method for Estimating in Situ Sampling Rates of Nonpolar Passive Samplers
    Booij, Kees
    Smedes, Foppe
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (17) : 6789 - 6794
  • [7] Application of passive sampling for measuring dissolved concentrations of organic contaminants in the water column at three marine superfund sites
    Burgess, Robert M.
    Lohmann, Rainer
    Schubauer-Berigan, Joseph P.
    Reitsma, Pamela
    Perron, Monique M.
    Lefkovitz, Lisa
    Cantwell, Mark G.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2015, 34 (08) : 1720 - 1733
  • [8] DITORO DM, 1991, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V10, P1541, DOI [10.1897/1552-8618(1991)10[1541:TBFESQ]2.0.CO
  • [9] 2, 10.1002/etc.5620101203]
  • [10] Calculating the Diffusive Flux of Persistent Organic Pollutants between Sediments and the Water Column on the Palos Verdes Shelf Superfund Site Using Polymeric Passive Samplers
    Fernandez, Loretta A.
    Lao, Wenjian
    Maruya, Keith A.
    Burgess, Robert M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (07) : 3925 - 3934