THE PROCESS OF CONSTRUCTING ONTOLOGICAL MEANING BASED ON CRIMINAL LAW VERBS

被引:3
作者
Felices Lago, Angel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain
来源
CIRCULO DE LINGUISTICA APLICADA A LA COMUNICACION | 2016年 / 65期
关键词
FunGramKB; ontology building; conceptual modelling; term extraction;
D O I
10.5209/rev_CLAC.2016.v65.51983
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This study intends to account for the process involved in the construction of the conceptual meaning of verbs (#EVENTS) directly related to legal aspects of terrorism and organized crime based on the evidence provided by the Globalcrimeterm Corpus and the consistent application of specific criteria for term extraction. The selected 49 concepts have eventually been integrated in the Core Ontology of FunGramKB (Functional Grammar Knowledge Base), a knowledge base which is founded on the principles of deep semantics and is also aimed at the computational development of the Lexical Constructional Model (www.fungramkb.com). To achieve this purpose, key phases of the COHERENT methodology (Perinan Pascual & Mairal Uson 2011) are followed, particularly those which involve the modelling, subsumption and hierarchisation of the aforementioned verbal concepts. The final outcome of this research shows that most of the apparently specialised conceptual units should eventually be included in the Core Ontology instead of the specific Globalcrimeterm Subontology, due to the fact that the semantic content of their corresponding lexical units can be found in widely used learner's dictionaries and, consequently, this conceptual information is not only shared by the experts in the field but also by the layperson and the average speaker of the language.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 148
页数:40
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [11] Ontologies of Professional Legal Knowledge as the Basis for Intelligent IT Support for Judges
    V. R. Benjamins
    J. Contreras
    P. Casanovas
    M. Ayuso
    M. Becue
    L. Lemus
    C. Urios
    [J]. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2004, 12 (4) : 359 - 378
  • [12] Biber D., 1993, Literary Linguist. Comput., V8, P243, DOI DOI 10.1093/LLC/8.4.243
  • [13] Boer A., 2001, P 2 INT WORKSH LEG O, P37
  • [14] Bowker Lynne., 2002, WORKING SPECIALIZED
  • [15] Use and reuse of legal ontologies in knowledge engineering and information management
    Breuker, J
    Valente, A
    Winkels, R
    [J]. LAW AND THE SEMANTIC WEB: LEGAL ONTOLOGIES, METHODOLOGIES, LEGAL INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, AND APPLICATIONS, 2005, 3369 : 36 - 64
  • [16] Breuker J., 2008, LAW ONTOLOGIES SEMAN
  • [17] Breuker J., 2004, P 3 INT C FORM ONT I, P210
  • [18] Breuker J, 2011, LAW GOV TECHNOL SER, V1, P69, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0120-5_4
  • [19] Cabre Castellvi Maria Teresa, 1999, TERMINOLOGY THEORY M
  • [20] Cabre Maria Teresa, 2004, P LREC 2004, P87