The safety assessment of fragrance materials

被引:99
作者
Bickers, DR
Calow, P
Greim, HA
Hanifin, JM
Rogers, AE
Saurat, JH
Sipes, IG
Smith, RL
Tagami, H
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Tech Univ Munich, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[4] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[5] Boston Univ, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Univ Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[7] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ USA
[8] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London, England
[9] Tohoku Univ, Sendai, Miyagi 980, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0273-2300(03)00003-5
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Safety evaluation of the large number of diverse chemicals used as fragrance ingredients follows a systematic prioritization of data generation and analysis, consideration of exposure and critical analysis of the quality of the available information. In prior publications the research priorities used by the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM), and the methods of exposure estimation used by industry have been summarized. This paper provides details of the approach used by the RIFM Expert Panel (REXPAN), to examine the dermal effects, systemic toxicity and environmental consequences of the use of and exposure to fragrance materials, which allow a reliable determination of safe use under intended conditions. The key to the usefulness of this analysis is the grouping of more than 2600 discrete ingredients into classes, based on chemical structures. Research sponsored by RIFM, data supplied by member companies, and relevant published reports from many sources are all considered during hazard characterization. A discussion is provided of REXPAN's decision tree approach to assessing the dermal, systemic and environmental endpoints and the types and quality of data included. This overall process results in well-documented conclusions which are provided to the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) as the basis for consideration of a new or existing Fragrance Material Standard and to industry for appropriate product risk management actions. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 273
页数:56
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   The FEMA GRAS assessment of alicyclic substances used as flavour ingredients [J].
Adams, TB ;
Hallagan, JB ;
Putnam, JM ;
Gierke, TL ;
Doull, J ;
Munro, IC ;
Newberne, P ;
Portoghese, PS ;
Smith, RL ;
Wagner, BM ;
Weil, CS ;
Woods, LA ;
Ford, RA .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 34 (09) :763-828
[2]  
ANDERS MW, 1989, INTERMEDIARY XENOBIOTIC METABOLISM IN ANIMALS : METHODOLOGY, MECHANISMS AND SIGNIFICANCE, P81
[3]  
ANDERSEN FA, 2001, INT J TOXICOLOGY S2, V20
[4]   The time-dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals [J].
Andersen, KE ;
Johansen, JD ;
Bruze, M ;
Frosch, PJ ;
Goossens, A ;
Lepoittevin, JP ;
Rastogi, S ;
White, I ;
Menné, T .
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 170 (03) :166-171
[5]  
[Anonymous], ENZYMATIC BASIS DETO
[6]   Sensitization methodology and primary prevention of the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials [J].
Api, AM .
DERMATOLOGY, 2002, 205 (01) :84-87
[7]  
API AM, 1999, 1 M EXP CONT DERM RE
[8]   Environmental risk assessment for the polycyclic musks, AHTN and HHCB - II. Effect assessment and risk characterisation [J].
Balk, F ;
Ford, RA .
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 1999, 111 (1-2) :81-94
[9]   Environmental risk assessment for the polycyclic musks AHTN and HHCB in the EU - I. Fate and exposure assessment [J].
Balk, F ;
Ford, RA .
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 1999, 111 (1-2) :57-79
[10]  
BICKERS D, 2003, IN PRESS FOOD CHEM T