Population attributable fraction estimation for established breast cancer risk factors: Considering the issues of high prevalence and unmodifiability

被引:87
作者
Rockhill, B
Weinberg, CR
Newman, B
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Channing Lab, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Natl Inst Environm Hlth Sci, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
breast neoplasms; risk factors;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009535
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Established breast cancer risk factors, in addition to being relatively unmodifiable, are highly prevalent among US women. Previous reports of population attributable fraction for the established risk factors have used definitions that resulted in 75-100% of women in the source population labeled exposed. The practical value of such estimates has not been discussed; further, the estimates have frequently been misinterpreted. in the context of examining the interpretation and public health value of such estimates, the authors demonstrate the sensitivity of the population attributable fraction to changes in exposure cutpoints. They use data from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, a case-control study of breast cancer conducted in North Carolina between 1993 and 1996. For the four established risk factors (menarche before age 14 years,first birth at age 20 years or later/nulliparity, family history of breast cancer, and history of benign breast biopsy), the estimated population attributable fraction was 0.25 (95% confidence interval 0.06-0.48). Over 98% of the source population was exposed to at least one of these risk factors. The population attributable fraction estimate was reduced to 0.15 when more restrictive definitions of early menarche (less than age 12 years) and late age at first full-term pregnancy (30 years or more) were used (proportion exposed, 0.62). Population attributable fractions for established breast cancer risk factors probably have little public health value because of both the high proportions exposed and the relative unmodifiability of the risk factor distributions.
引用
收藏
页码:826 / 833
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   ESTIMATING THE POPULATION ATTRIBUTABLE RISK FOR MULTIPLE RISK-FACTORS USING CASE-CONTROL DATA [J].
BRUZZI, P ;
GREEN, SB ;
BYAR, DP ;
BRINTON, LA ;
SCHAIRER, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1985, 122 (05) :904-913
[2]  
Efron B., 1994, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, V57, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593
[3]  
FREEMAN HP, 1989, CANCER, V63, P2562, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890615)63:12<2562::AID-CNCR2820631234>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-0
[5]   PERSPECTIVES ON CANCER PREVENTION [J].
GARFINKEL, L .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1995, 45 (01) :5-7
[6]   MEDICAL PROGRESS .1. BREAST-CANCER [J].
HARRIS, JR ;
LIPPMAN, ME ;
VERONESI, U ;
WILLETT, W .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (05) :319-328
[7]   BREAST-CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY - SUMMARY AND FUTURE-DIRECTIONS [J].
KELSEY, JL .
EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 1993, 15 (01) :256-263
[8]   USING LOGISTIC-REGRESSION TO ESTIMATE THE ADJUSTED ATTRIBUTABLE RISK OF LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT IN AN UNMATCHED CASE-CONTROL STUDY [J].
KOOPERBERG, C ;
PETITTI, DB .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 2 (05) :363-366
[9]   USE OF RISK-FACTORS IN COUNSELING PATIENTS [J].
LOVE, SM .
HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1989, 3 (04) :599-610
[10]   PROPORTION OF BREAST-CANCER CASES IN THE UNITED-STATES EXPLAINED BY WELL-ESTABLISHED RISK-FACTORS [J].
MADIGAN, MP ;
ZIEGLER, RG ;
BENICHOU, J ;
BYRNE, C ;
HOOVER, RN .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (22) :1681-1685