Coercion in nursing homes: Perspectives of patients and relatives

被引:9
作者
Gjerberg, Elisabeth [1 ]
Lillemoen, Lillian [1 ]
Pedersen, Reidar [1 ]
Forde, Reidun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, N-0318 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Nursing homes; coercion; patients; relatives; qualitative study; PHYSICAL RESTRAINT; OLDER-PEOPLE; INSTITUTIONAL CARE; DIGNITY; TRUST; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1177/0969733014564907
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Studies have demonstrated the extensive use of coercion in Norwegian nursing homes, which represents ethical, professional as well as legal challenges to the staff. We have, however, limited knowledge of the experiences and views of nursing home patients and their relatives. Objectives: The aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of nursing home patients and next of kin on the use of coercion; are there situations where the use of coercion can be defended, and if so, under which circumstances? Methods: The data are based on individual interviews with 35 patients living in six nursing homes and seven focus group interviews with 60 relatives. Ethical considerations: Participation was based on written informed consent, and the study was approved by the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics. Results: More than half of the patients and the majority of the relatives accepted the use of coercion, trusting the staff to act in the patient's best interest. However, the acceptance of coercion is strongly related to the patients' lack of understanding, to prevent health risks and to preserve the patient's dignity. Conclusion: The majority of nursing home patients and relatives accepted the use of coercion in specific situations, while at the same time they emphasised the need to try alternative strategies first. There is still a need for good qualitative research on the use of coercion in nursing homes, especially with a closer focus on the perspectives and experiences of nursing home patients.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 264
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
BEAUCHAMP T. L., 2001, Principles of Biomedical Ethics
[2]  
Delmar C, 1999, TILLID OG MAGT
[3]   Strain in nursing care of people with dementia: Nurses' experience in Australia, Sweden and United Kingdom [J].
Edberg, Anna-Karin ;
Bird, Mike ;
Richards, David A. ;
Woods, Robert ;
Keeley, Philip ;
Davis-Quarrell, Vivienne .
AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2008, 12 (02) :236-243
[4]   Physical restraint initiation in nursing homes and subsequent resident health [J].
Engberg, John ;
Castle, Nicholas G. ;
McCaffrey, Daniel .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2008, 48 (04) :442-452
[5]   Patient injury and physical restraint devices: a systematic review [J].
Evans, D ;
Wood, J ;
Lambert, L .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2003, 41 (03) :274-282
[6]   Dignity and respect for dignity - Two key health professional values: Implications for nursing practice [J].
Gallagher, A .
NURSING ETHICS, 2004, 11 (06) :587-599
[7]   Dignity in the care of older people - a review of the theoretical and empirical literature [J].
Gallagher, Ann ;
Li, Sarah ;
Wainwright, Paul ;
Jones, Ian Rees ;
Lee, Diana .
BMC NURSING, 2008, 7
[8]   Use of physical restraint in nursing homes: clinical-ethical considerations [J].
Gastmans, C ;
Milisen, K .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2006, 32 (03) :148-152
[9]   Dignity-enhancing nursing care: A foundational ethical framework [J].
Gastmans, Chris .
NURSING ETHICS, 2013, 20 (02) :142-149
[10]   How to avoid and prevent coercion in nursing homes: A qualitative study [J].
Gjerberg, Elisabeth ;
Hem, Marit Helene ;
Forde, Reidun ;
Pedersen, Reidar .
NURSING ETHICS, 2013, 20 (06) :632-644