Optimal intensity targets for greenhouse gas emissions trading under uncertainty

被引:101
作者
Jotzo, Frank [1 ]
Pezzey, John C. V.
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Pacific & Asian Studies, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Ctr Resource & Environm Studies, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
关键词
climate policy; emissions trading; uncertainty; intensity targets; optimality; simulation modelling;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-006-9078-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Uncertainty is an obstacle for commitments under cap and trade schemes for emission permits. We assess how well intensity targets, where each country's permit allocation is indexed to its future realized GDP, can cope with uncertainties in international greenhouse emissions trading. We present some empirical foundations for intensity targets and derive a simple rule for the optimal degree of indexation to GDP. Using an 18-region simulation model of a cooperative, global cap-and-trade treaty in 2020 under multiple uncertainties and endogenous commitments, we show that optimal intensity targets could reduce the cost of uncertainty and achieve significant increases in global abatement. The optimal degree of indexation to GDP would vary greatly between countries, including super-indexation in some advanced countries, and partial indexation for most developing countries. Standard intensity targets (with one-to-one indexation) would also improve the overall outcome, but to a lesser degree and not in all individual cases. Although target indexation is no magic wand for a future global climate treaty, gains from reduced cost uncertainty and the potential for more stringent environmental commitments could justify the increased complexity and other potential downsides of intensity targets.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 284
页数:26
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WHAT MIGHT DEV COUNT
[2]  
[Anonymous], GLOB MIT NON CO2 GRE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, POLITICS INT LAW
[4]  
[Anonymous], INT EN OUTL 2004
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, World Energy Outlook. Chapter 10. Energy and Development, DOI [DOI 10.1787/WEO-2004-EN, 10.1787/weo-2004-en]
[6]   The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth: time series evidence from Asian developing countries [J].
Asafu-Adjaye, J .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2000, 22 (06) :615-625
[7]   Beyond crisis science and emergency legislation: What do we really know about oil spills [J].
Barrow, CW ;
Rothschild, BJ .
SPILL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY BULLETIN, 2002, 7 (1-2) :3-6
[8]   Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals? [J].
Berk, Marcel M. ;
den Elzen, Michel G. J. .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2001, 1 (04) :465-480
[9]   Does the Bush Administration's climate policy mean climate protection? [J].
Blanchard, O ;
Perkaus, JF .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (18) :1993-1998
[10]   A cost-effective approach to attracting low-income countries to international emissions trading:: Theory and experiments [J].
Bohm, P ;
Carlén, B .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2002, 23 (02) :187-211