In vitro embryotoxicity assessment with dental restorative materials

被引:101
|
作者
Schwengberg, S
Bohlen, H
Kleinsasser, N
Kehe, K
Seiss, M
Walther, UI
Hickel, R
Reichl, FX
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Walther Straub Inst Pharmakol & Toxikol, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[2] Axiogenesis AG, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Regensburg, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, D-8400 Regensburg, Germany
[4] Sanitatsakad Bunderswehr, Inst Pharmacol & Toxicol, D-80937 Munich, Germany
[5] Univ Munich, Dept Operat Restorat Dent Periodontol & Pedodont, D-80336 Munich, Germany
关键词
dental materials; embryotoxicity; teratogenesis; mouse embryonic stem cells;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2004.08.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. Resin (co)monomers; may be released from restorative dental materials and can diffuse into the tooth pulp or the gingiva, and can reach the saliva and the circulating blood. Genotoxic potential of some dental composite components has been clearly documented. The genotoxic effects of xenobiotics can represent a possible step in tumor initiation and/or embryotoxicity/teratogenesis. A modified fluorescent mouse embryonic stem cell test (R.E.Tox((R))) was used to test the embryotoxic potential of following dental restorative materials: Bisphenol A glycidylmethacrylate (BisGMA), urethanedimethacrylate (UDMA), hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA), and triethyleneglycoldimethacrylate (TEGDMA), as wet( as some of their metabolic intermediates 2,3-epoxy-2-methyl-propionicacid-methylester (EMPME), methacrylic acid (MA), and 2,3-epoxy-2-methylpropionic acid (EMPA). Methods. Mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells stably transfected with a vector containing the gene for the green fluorescent protein under control of the cardiac alpha-myosin heavy chain promoter were differentiated in the presence of various concentrations of the test compounds for 12 days. Fluorescence was measured using the TECAN Safire((R)) and values were expressed as percent of control values. To distinguish between cytotoxic and embryotoxic effects, all compounds were tested in a standard MTT assay. Results. HEMA, TEGDMA and EMPME did not influence the differentiation process of ES cells towards cardiac myocytes. No cytotoxic effects were observed at any of the concentration levels tested. Exposure to BisGMA resulted in a 50% decrease in cell Embryotoxic effects were also present at 10(-6) and 10(-7) M (p < 0.05). EMPA induced a decrease in ES cell differentiation at 10(-5) M (p < 0.01) without cytotoxic effects. No embryotoxic effects were induced at tower concentrations. Exposure to UDMA resulted in a slight decrease of cell differentiation at 10(-5) M (p < 0.05). Exposure of cells to MA resulted in an increase of cardiac differentiation up to 150% (p < 0.05) at 10(-5) M without cytotoxic effects. Conclusions. BisGMA induced a significant high embryotoxic/teratogenic effect over a large range of concentration. Therefore attention should be focused on this dental monomer, which should be investigated further by in vivo experiments. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 55
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Embryotoxicity assays for leached components from dental restorative materials
    Libonati, Antonio
    Marzo, Giuseppe
    Klinger, Francesca G.
    Farini, Donatella
    Gallusi, Gianni
    Tecco, Simona
    Mummolo, Stefano
    De Felici, Massimo
    Campanella, Vincenzo
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2011, 9 : 136
  • [2] Embryotoxicity assays for leached components from dental restorative materials
    Antonio Libonati
    Giuseppe Marzo
    Francesca G Klinger
    Donatella Farini
    Gianni Gallusi
    Simona Tecco
    Stefano Mummolo
    Massimo De Felici
    Vincenzo Campanella
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 9
  • [3] In vitro Study on Water Absorption of Dental Restorative Materials
    Todor, Liana
    Fluieras, Razvan
    Bonta, Dan Florin
    Olariu, Iustin
    Lile, Ioana Elena
    Stana, Otilia Lavinia
    Popovici, Ramona Amina
    Todor, Sergiu Andrei
    Domocos, Daniela
    Matichescu, Ana Maria
    MATERIALE PLASTICE, 2023, 60 (04) : 135 - 143
  • [4] Initial in vitro bacterial adhesion on dental restorative materials
    Kim, Ha-Young
    Yeo, In-Sung
    Lee, Jai-Bong
    Kim, Sung-Hun
    Kim, Dae-Joon
    Han, Jung-Suk
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2012, 35 (10): : 773 - 779
  • [5] Protective Buffering Capacity of Restorative Dental Materials In Vitro
    Fuss, Markus
    Wicht, Michael J.
    Attin, Thomas
    Derman, Sonja H. M.
    Noack, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2017, 19 (02): : 177 - 183
  • [6] In-vitro wear of restorative dental materials.
    Abozenada, B
    Pober, R
    Giordano, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A223 - A223
  • [7] A comparative life cycle assessment of dental restorative materials
    Smith, Lucy
    Ali, Mustafa
    Agrissais, Manon
    Mulligan, Steven
    Koh, Lenny
    Martin, Nicolas
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2023, 39 (01) : 13 - 24
  • [8] RESTORATIVE DENTAL MATERIALS
    WILLIAMS, RA
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1965, 19 (05): : 702 - &
  • [9] RESTORATIVE DENTAL MATERIALS
    BORLAND, DW
    METALS FORUM, 1980, 3 (04): : 197 - 197
  • [10] RESTORATIVE DENTAL MATERIALS
    SALZMANN, JA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1965, 51 (06): : 467 - &