The Maximum Resource Allocation for Uncertainty Reduction in a Decision-analytic Concept Selection

被引:5
作者
Takai, Shun [1 ]
Ishii, Kosuke [2 ]
机构
[1] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Mfg Modeling Lab, Dept Mech Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
CONCURRENT ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS | 2010年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
decision analysis; concept selection; value of information; ENGINEERING DESIGN; VARIANT DESIGN; METHODOLOGY; FRAMEWORK; INFORMATION; SUPPORT; MODELS;
D O I
10.1177/1063293X09359551
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This article addresses a procedure to identify the maximum resource allocated to uncertainty reduction activity in a decision-analytic product concept selection. Concept selection is one of the most important decisions in product development. Success of a new product depends on the goodness of a concept chosen in the concept selection stage. At the same time, it is one of the most challenging decisions, because engineers need to select a concept facing large degrees of uncertainties about future customer preferences, competitions, economic situations, feasibilities of new technologies, and product costs. Information on a particular uncertain event is sought in order to reduce uncertainty; however, information gathering is meaningful only if the benefit of additional information outweighs the cost of the effort. In decision analysis, the maximum resource allocated to an information gathering effort is defined by the expected value of perfect information (EVPI), which is calculated by assuming that the information is perfectly accurate. This article illustrates a procedure to calculate the EVPI and, thus, the maximum resource allocated to uncertainty reduction activity in a decision-analytic concept selection. The utility of the proposed approach is demonstrated in a decision-analytic concept selection for a public project.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 29
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] The value of using imprecise probabilities in engineering design
    Aughenbaugh, Jason Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2006, 128 (04) : 969 - 979
  • [2] Clemen R., 1996, Making hard decisions, V2nd
  • [3] Configurable product design using multiple fuzzy models
    Deciu, ER
    Ostrosi, E
    Ferney, M
    Gheorghe, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2005, 16 (02) : 209 - 235
  • [4] Decision support in concurrent engineering -: The utility-based selection decision support problem
    Fernández, MG
    Seepersad, CC
    Rosen, DW
    Allen, JK
    Mistree, F
    [J]. CONCURRENT ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2005, 13 (01): : 13 - 27
  • [5] Life-cycle modeling for adaptive and variant design. Part 1: Methodology
    Fitch, P
    Cooper, JS
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2005, 15 (04) : 216 - 228
  • [6] Life cycle modeling for adaptive and variant design - part 2: case study
    Fitch, P
    Cooper, JS
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2005, 15 (04) : 229 - 241
  • [7] Linking optimal design decisions to the theory of the firm: The case of resource allocation
    Georgiopoulos, P
    Jonsson, M
    Papalambros, PY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2005, 127 (03) : 358 - 366
  • [8] Development and characterisation of error functions in design
    Goh, Y. M.
    McMahon, C. A.
    Booker, J. D.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2007, 18 (03) : 129 - 148
  • [9] Assessing value in platformed product family design
    Gonzalez-Zugasti, JP
    Otto, KN
    Baker, JD
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND CONCURRENT ENGINEERING, 2001, 13 (01): : 30 - 41
  • [10] An approach for testing methods for modeling uncertainty
    Haftka, Raphael T.
    Rosca, Raluca I.
    Nikolaidis, Efstratios
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2006, 128 (05) : 1038 - 1049